Acer neoTouch P400 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Acer neoTouch P400 vs. Sony Ericsson Aino
Acer neoTouch P400
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
Sony Ericsson Aino
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Acer neoTouch P400 vs. Samsung GALAXY mini 2
Samsung GALAXY mini 2
- NFC
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (176 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Acer neoTouch P400 vs. HTC Touch HD
Acer neoTouch P400
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
HTC Touch HD
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 288 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Acer neoTouch P400 vs. Acer neoTouch
Acer neoTouch P400
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Acer neoTouch
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Acer neoTouch P400 vs. Acer neoTouch P400 American version
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Acer neoTouch P400 vs. HTC One S
Acer neoTouch P400
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
HTC One S
- Dual core processor
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (256 ppi)
- High-resolution display (540 x 960 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
- Small dimensions (5.15 x 2.56 x 0.31 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Acer neoTouch P400 vs. Acer Liquid Metal
Acer neoTouch P400
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
