x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Acer beTouch E210 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Acer beTouch E210 Acer beTouch E210


  • Slow processor (600 MHz)

Acer beTouch E130 Acer beTouch E130


  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Acer beTouch E210 Acer beTouch E210


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

HP iPAQ Glisten HP iPAQ Glisten


  • Low pixel density screen (160 ppi)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow processor (600 MHz vs 533 MHz)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Acer beTouch E210 Acer beTouch E210


  • Slow processor (600 MHz)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Galaxy Y Pro DUOS Samsung Galaxy Y Pro DUOS


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Acer beTouch E210 Acer beTouch E210


  • Slow processor (600 MHz)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Acer beTouch E210 Acer beTouch E210


  • Slow processor (600 MHz)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia Asha 210 Nokia Asha 210


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (169 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Acer beTouch E210 Acer beTouch E210


  • Slow processor (600 MHz)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia Asha 302 Nokia Asha 302


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Acer beTouch E210 Acer beTouch E210


  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia N95 8GB Nokia N95 8GB


  • Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.82 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Slow processor (600 MHz vs 332 MHz)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories