Acer beTouch E140 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Acer beTouch E140 vs. Samsung SGH-G800
Acer beTouch E140
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Samsung SGH-G800
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Acer beTouch E140 vs. Samsung Galaxy S Duos
Acer beTouch E140
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Samsung Galaxy S Duos
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (768 MB RAM)
- Dual SIM card support
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Acer beTouch E140 vs. Samsung Pixon12
Acer beTouch E140
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Samsung Pixon12
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (301 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (12.1 megapixels)
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Acer beTouch E140 vs. Huawei IDEOS X1
Acer beTouch E140
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz vs 528 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Acer beTouch E140 vs. i-mate K-JAR
i-mate K-JAR
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz vs 200 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Acer beTouch E140 vs. Sony Xperia sola
Acer beTouch E140
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Sony Xperia sola
- Dual core processor
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (265 ppi)
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- NFC
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 2.32 x 0.39 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Acer beTouch E140 vs. Samsung Galaxy Pocket
Acer beTouch E140
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
Samsung Galaxy Pocket
- Small dimensions (4.08 x 2.26 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
