x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Acer beTouch E130 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Acer beTouch E130 Acer beTouch E130


  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)

Acer beTouch E210 Acer beTouch E210


  • Single-core processor

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Huawei Boulder Huawei Boulder


  • Small dimensions (4.53 x 2.47 x 0.39 inches)
  • Single-core processor

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Acer beTouch E130 Acer beTouch E130


  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Sony Ericsson txt Sony Ericsson txt


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



Acer beTouch E130 Acer beTouch E130


  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Sony Xperia M Sony Xperia M


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi vs 245 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Acer beTouch E130 Acer beTouch E130


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia E73 Mode Nokia E73 Mode


  • Small dimensions (4.48 x 2.30 x 0.40 inches)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Acer beTouch E130 Acer beTouch E130


  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia Asha 303 Nokia Asha 303


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Acer beTouch E130 Acer beTouch E130


  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia 225 Nokia 225


  • Small dimensions (4.88 x 2.19 x 0.41 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an e-mail client

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi vs 143 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories