Acer beTouch E120 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Acer beTouch E120 vs. Samsung Galaxy Y DUOS
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 127 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Acer beTouch E120 vs. Samsung Galaxy Pocket
Samsung Galaxy Pocket
- Small dimensions (4.08 x 2.26 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Acer beTouch E120 vs. LG GT540G
Acer beTouch E120
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks autofocus
LG GT540G
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Acer beTouch E120 vs. Acer Liquid e
Acer beTouch E120
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Acer Liquid e
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi)
- Slow processor (768 MHz)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Acer beTouch E120 vs. Samsung Galaxy Ace
Acer beTouch E120
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 165 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Acer beTouch E120 vs. Samsung UltraTOUCH
Acer beTouch E120
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
Samsung UltraTOUCH
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Small dimensions (4.33 x 2.03 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Acer beTouch E120 vs. Acer Liquid
Acer beTouch E120
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Acer Liquid
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi)
- Slow processor (768 MHz)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
