Acer beTouch E100 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Acer beTouch E100 vs. Samsung GALAXY mini
Acer beTouch E100
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (528 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (146 ppi vs 127 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Acer beTouch E100 vs. Samsung Galaxy Y
Acer beTouch E100
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (146 ppi vs 133 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Acer beTouch E100 vs. Acer beTouch E101
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (146 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Acer beTouch E100 vs. Apple iPhone 4
Acer beTouch E100
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (146 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Apple iPhone 4
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
- High-resolution display (640 x 960 pixels)
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Small dimensions (4.50 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Acer beTouch E100 vs. Samsung GALAXY mini 2
Acer beTouch E100
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (146 ppi vs 176 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Acer beTouch E100 vs. Apple iPhone 3G
Acer beTouch E100
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Apple iPhone 3G
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (528 MHz vs 412 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (146 ppi vs 165 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
