Acer X960 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Acer X960 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Acer X960 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Acer X960 vs Nokia Lumia 900
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneAcer X960-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi)
- Slow processor (533 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Acer X960 vs Nokia Lumia 800
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi vs 252 ppi)
Acer X960-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (533 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Acer X960 vs LG Optimus Me P350
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
Acer X960-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi)
- Slow processor (533 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Acer X960 vs Nokia Lumia 710
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi vs 252 ppi)
Acer X960-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (533 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Acer X960 vs Acer Liquid Metal
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi vs 259 ppi)
Acer X960-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (533 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Acer X960 vs Acer Stream
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi vs 252 ppi)
Acer X960-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (533 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Acer X960 vs Sony Ericsson Xperia X8
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
Acer X960-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi)
- Slow processor (533 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Acer X960 vs Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (533 MHz vs 600 MHz)
Acer X960-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call


