Acer M900 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Acer M900 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Acer M900 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Acer M900 vs Toshiba PORTEGE G910
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches vs 0.77 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Acer M900-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (533 MHz)
Toshiba PORTEGE G910-specific Pros & Cons
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (311 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Acer M900 vs HTC P6500
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (533 MHz vs 400 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches vs 0.80 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Acer M900-specific Pros & Cons
none
HTC P6500-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Acer M900 vs Nokia N900
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (533 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches vs 0.77 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
Acer M900-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Nokia N900-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
Acer M900 vs LG GW910
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Acer M900-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (533 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
LG GW910-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi)
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Acer M900 vs LG IQ GW825
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Acer M900-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (533 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
LG IQ GW825-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (292 ppi)
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Acer M900 vs LG Optimus 7Q
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Bulky
Acer M900-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (533 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
LG Optimus 7Q-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi)
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Acer M900 vs LG PRADA II
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches vs 0.66 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Acer M900-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (533 MHz)
- Bulky
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
LG PRADA II-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Acer M900 vs Nokia C6
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (533 MHz vs 434 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches vs 0.66 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
Acer M900-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Nokia C6-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
