Acer M900 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Acer M900 vs. Acer F900
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (533 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Acer M900 vs. Nokia C6
Acer M900
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (533 MHz vs 434 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches vs 0.66 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
in-depth comparison
Acer M900 vs. Samsung CorbyPRO B5310
Acer M900
- Slow processor (533 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
in-depth comparison
Acer M900 vs. Samsung OMNIA Pro 4
Acer M900
- Slow processor (533 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Samsung OMNIA Pro 4
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (173 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
Acer M900 vs. Samsung GALAXY mini
Acer M900
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung GALAXY mini
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (127 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (533 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
