Acer Liquid Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Acer Liquid vs. Acer Liquid Gallant Duo
Acer Liquid
- Slow processor (768 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Acer Liquid Gallant Duo
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- High-resolution display (540 x 960 pixels)
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Dual SIM card support
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi vs 256 ppi)
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Acer Liquid vs. Acer CloudMobile
Acer Liquid
- Slow processor (768 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Acer CloudMobile
- Dual core processor
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi vs 342 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Acer Liquid vs. Panasonic ELUGA
Acer Liquid
- Slow processor (768 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
Panasonic ELUGA
- Dual core processor
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- High-resolution display (540 x 960 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- Small dimensions (4.84 x 2.44 x 0.31 inches inches)
- Water-resistant phone
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi vs 256 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Acer Liquid vs. Samsung Galaxy S III
Acer Liquid
- Slow processor (768 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Samsung Galaxy S III
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (4.8 inches)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi vs 306 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Acer Liquid vs. HTC One X
Acer Liquid
- Slow processor (768 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
HTC One X
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (4.7 inches)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi vs 312 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Acer Liquid vs. Acer Liquid Metal
Acer Liquid
- Slow processor (768 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi vs 259 ppi)
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Acer Liquid vs. Google Nexus 4
Acer Liquid
- Slow processor (768 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Google Nexus 4
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (4.7 inches)
- High-resolution display (768 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
- Thin body, measuring less than 9.5mm/0.37inches (0.36 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi vs 318 ppi)
in-depth comparison
