x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Acer Liquid e Acer Liquid e


  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Acer Liquid E2 Acer Liquid E2


  • Quad core processor

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi vs 245 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)

in-depth comparison



Acer Liquid e Acer Liquid e


  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Acer Liquid E3 Acer Liquid E3


  • Big display (4.7 inches)
  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen (312 ppi)
  • Quad core processor
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)

in-depth comparison



Acer Liquid e Acer Liquid e


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Sony Ericsson Vivaz pro Sony Ericsson Vivaz pro


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi vs 229 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels vs 360 x 640 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Acer Liquid e Acer Liquid e


  • Single-core processor

Acer Liquid Z3 Acer Liquid Z3


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Small dimensions (4.29 x 2.36 x 0.41 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi vs 165 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels vs 320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Acer Liquid e Acer Liquid e


  • Low-resolution video capture

Apple iPhone Apple iPhone


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi vs 165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels vs 320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Acer Liquid e Acer Liquid e


  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

HTC Desire 510 HTC Desire 510


  • Big display (4.7 inches)
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi vs 208 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Acer Liquid e Acer Liquid e


  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia XL Nokia XL


  • Big display (5.0 inches)
  • Dual SIM card support

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi vs 187 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 768 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories