x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Acer Liquid e Acer Liquid e


  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Acer Liquid E3 Acer Liquid E3


  • Big display (4.7 inches)
  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen (312 ppi)
  • Quad core processor
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)

in-depth comparison



Acer Liquid e Acer Liquid e


  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Acer Liquid E2 Acer Liquid E2


  • Quad core processor

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi vs 245 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)

in-depth comparison



Acer Liquid e Acer Liquid e


  • Single-core processor

Acer Liquid Z3 Acer Liquid Z3


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Small dimensions (4.29 x 2.36 x 0.41 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi vs 165 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels vs 320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Acer Liquid e Acer Liquid e


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Sony Ericsson Vivaz pro Sony Ericsson Vivaz pro


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi vs 229 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels vs 360 x 640 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Acer Liquid e Acer Liquid e


  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution video capture

Nokia Lumia 520 Nokia Lumia 520


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi vs 235 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Acer Liquid e Acer Liquid e


  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

HTC Desire 510 HTC Desire 510


  • Big display (4.7 inches)
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi vs 208 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



Acer Liquid e Acer Liquid e


  • Low pixel density screen (267 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Sony Xperia Z1 Compact Sony Xperia Z1 Compact


  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen (342 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (20.7 megapixels)
  • Quad core processor
  • Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Water-resistant phone
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories