Acer Iconia Tab A210 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Acer Iconia Tab A210 vs. Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 (10.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 (10.1)
- Dual core processor
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (149 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Acer Iconia Tab A210 vs. Acer Iconia Tab A510
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Quad core processor
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz vs 1300 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (149 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Acer Iconia Tab A210 vs. Acer Iconia Tab A211
Acer Iconia Tab A211
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Quad core processor
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM vs 1000 MB RAM)
- No rear camera
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (149 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Acer Iconia Tab A210 vs. Google Nexus 7
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Quad core processor
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- No rear camera
in-depth comparison
Acer Iconia Tab A210 vs. Acer ICONIA TAB A110
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Quad core processor
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- No rear camera
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (149 ppi vs 170 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Acer Iconia Tab A210 vs. Acer ICONIA TAB A200
Acer ICONIA TAB A200
- Dual core processor
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- No rear camera
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (149 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Acer Iconia Tab A210 vs. Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1
- Dual core processor
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz vs 1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (149 ppi)
in-depth comparison
