Acer ICONIA TAB A500 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Acer ICONIA TAB A500 vs. Acer ICONIA TAB A200
Acer ICONIA TAB A200
- No rear camera
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (149 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Acer ICONIA TAB A500 vs. Acer Iconia Tab A510
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz vs 1300 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (149 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Acer ICONIA TAB A500 vs. Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 (10.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 (10.1)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (149 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Acer ICONIA TAB A500 vs. Acer Iconia Tab A700
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz vs 1300 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))
in-depth comparison
Acer ICONIA TAB A500 vs. Acer Iconia Tab A210
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz vs 1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (149 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Acer ICONIA TAB A500 vs. Acer ICONIA TAB A501
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (149 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Acer ICONIA TAB A500 vs. Samsung GALAXY Note 10.1
Samsung GALAXY Note 10.1
- Quad core processor
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Supports special active stylus for input
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz vs 1400 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM vs 2048 MB RAM)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (149 ppi)
in-depth comparison
