AT&T U2800A Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
AT&T U2800A vs. Samsung A157
Samsung A157
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE, GPRS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
AT&T U2800A vs. Alcatel OT510A
Alcatel OT510A
- Small dimensions (4.53 x 1.87 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
AT&T U2800A vs. AT&T Z221
AT&T Z221
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
AT&T U2800A vs. AT&T F160
AT&T F160
- Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.44 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
AT&T U2800A vs. AT&T Z331
AT&T Z331
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
AT&T U2800A vs. Motorola C168
Motorola C168
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches inches)
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
AT&T U2800A vs. LG A340
LG A340
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
