AT&T Quickfire Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to AT&T Quickfire the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how AT&T Quickfire compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
AT&T Quickfire vs Sharp FX
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
AT&T Quickfire-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
AT&T Quickfire vs T-Mobile Sidekick
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 179 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
AT&T Quickfire vs Samsung Dart
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 127 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
AT&T Quickfire-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
AT&T Quickfire vs Alcatel OT-802
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
AT&T Quickfire-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
AT&T Quickfire vs Sony Ericsson C905
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches vs 0.71 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
AT&T Quickfire-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
AT&T Quickfire vs LG Xenon
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
AT&T Quickfire-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
AT&T Quickfire vs LG Thrive
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
AT&T Quickfire-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
AT&T Quickfire vs Samsung Sunburst
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS vs EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
AT&T Quickfire-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches)

