x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

AT&T F160 AT&T F160


  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.44 inches)

LG Cosmos 3 LG Cosmos 3


  • Hardware QWERTY keyboard

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 200 ppi)

in-depth comparison



AT&T F160 AT&T F160


  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.44 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

AT&T U2800A AT&T U2800A


  • Lacks a camera on the back
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Does not support automatic screen brightness

in-depth comparison



ZTE F160 ZTE F160


  • Does not support fast data speeds (UMTS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.44 inches vs 4.57 x 1.93 x 0.43 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

in-depth comparison



AT&T F160 AT&T F160


  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.44 inches)

LG Prime LG Prime


  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 155 ppi)

in-depth comparison



ZTE Atlanta ZTE Atlanta


  • Does not support fast data speeds (UMTS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.44 inches vs 3.64 x 1.38 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.44 inches vs 4.17 x 2.10 x 0.47 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 155 ppi)

in-depth comparison



AT&T F160 AT&T F160


  • Lacks Wi-Fi

Nokia X3 Touch and Type Nokia X3 Touch and Type


  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.44 inches vs 4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories