x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

AT&T F160 AT&T F160


  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

ZTE F160 ZTE F160


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE, GPRS)
  • Lacks an e-mail client

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.44 inches vs 4.57 x 1.93 x 0.43 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



AT&T F160 AT&T F160


  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Nokia 515 Nokia 515


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.44 inches vs 4.49 x 1.89 x 0.43 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



ZTE Atlanta ZTE Atlanta


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.44 inches vs 3.64 x 1.38 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



AT&T F160 AT&T F160


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia 6500 classic Nokia 6500 classic


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.44 inches vs 4.32 x 1.77 x 0.37 inches)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



AT&T F160 AT&T F160


  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.44 inches)
  • The camera lacks flash

Nokia 6124 classic Nokia 6124 classic


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 200 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



AT&T F160 AT&T F160


  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.44 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

LG Optimus LTE II LG Optimus LTE II


  • Big display (4.7 inches)
  • High pixel densitiy screen, over 300ppi (312 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
  • Dual core processor
  • Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • NFC

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



AT&T F160 AT&T F160


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack

Nokia 301 Nokia 301


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.93 x 0.44 inches vs 4.49 x 1.97 x 0.49 inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories