x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

AT&T Avail 2 AT&T Avail 2


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE, GPRS)
  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



AT&T Avail 2 AT&T Avail 2


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE, GPRS)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

AT&T Z998 AT&T Z998


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 245 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

in-depth comparison



AT&T Avail 2 AT&T Avail 2


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE, GPRS)

AT&T Fusion 2 AT&T Fusion 2


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



AT&T Avail 2 AT&T Avail 2


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE, GPRS)
  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

ZTE Compel ZTE Compel


  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



AT&T Avail 2 AT&T Avail 2


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE, GPRS)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Nokia Lumia 635 Nokia Lumia 635


  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 218 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



AT&T Avail 2 AT&T Avail 2


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE, GPRS)
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Galaxy S6 Samsung Galaxy S6


  • Big display (5.1 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1440 x 2560 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (577 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)
  • 8-core processor
  • Lots of RAM (3072 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Small dimensions (5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.27 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



AT&T Avail 2 AT&T Avail 2


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE, GPRS)
  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks autofocus

Nokia Lumia 520 Nokia Lumia 520


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 235 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories