ARCHOS 32 Internet Tablet Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
ARCHOS 32 Internet Tablet vs. ARCHOS 43 Internet Tablet
ARCHOS 32 Internet Tablet
- Small dimensions (4.13 x 2.17 x 0.35 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (146 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
ARCHOS 43 Internet Tablet
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Mini HDMI (Type C))
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Common for both Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
ARCHOS 32 Internet Tablet vs. ARCHOS 28 Internet Tablet
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.13 x 2.17 x 0.35 inches inches vs 3.94 x 2.13 x 0.35 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (146 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
ARCHOS 32 Internet Tablet vs. Samsung Galaxy Player 50
ARCHOS 32 Internet Tablet
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.13 x 2.17 x 0.35 inches inches vs 4.15 x 2.13 x 0.44 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (146 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
ARCHOS 32 Internet Tablet vs. Samsung GALAXY mini
ARCHOS 32 Internet Tablet
- Small dimensions (4.13 x 2.17 x 0.35 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung GALAXY mini
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (146 ppi vs 127 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
ARCHOS 32 Internet Tablet vs. Samsung GALAXY S WiFi 3.6
ARCHOS 32 Internet Tablet
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.13 x 2.17 x 0.35 inches inches vs 4.56 x 2.46 x 0.38 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (146 ppi vs 158 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
ARCHOS 32 Internet Tablet vs. Samsung Galaxy Player 4.2
ARCHOS 32 Internet Tablet
- Small dimensions (4.13 x 2.17 x 0.35 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (146 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
in-depth comparison
ARCHOS 32 Internet Tablet vs. Samsung Galaxy Player 3.6
ARCHOS 32 Internet Tablet
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.13 x 2.17 x 0.35 inches inches vs 4.52 x 2.45 x 0.38 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (146 ppi vs 158 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
in-depth comparison
