x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






iPhones score highest touch responsiveness, more than twice as responsive as Android and Windows Phone devices

0. phoneArena 01 Oct 2013, 05:00 posted on

Have you ever thought just how responsive to touch your device really is? This is after all a key factor in determining how fast it feels, and now researchers from Agawi came up with a benchmark test that measures response times down to the millisecond…

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 05:10 20

1. UdhaiyaPrasanth (Posts: 76; Member since: 05 Sep 2012)


Wow! So that's how you technically define "lag"? Very Informative article PA!

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 05:14 9

5. msa1988 (Posts: 418; Member since: 30 Mar 2010)


Android users will still find a way to say 'no it still lags' and will site some article which only shows other Android users opinion on how they think Apple lags.

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 05:35 27

12. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)


This test can't rehabilitate iOS 7 lag since this test is about screen responsiveness to touch and it has nothing to do with iOS 7 as OS lag.

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 09:07 2

79. lallolu (Posts: 492; Member since: 18 Sep 2012)


I think it does actually. I am a die-hard android person but I played with an ipad recently and I noticed the touchscreen is very responsive but I thought it was due to the fact that I always use screen protectors on my own devices. Swiping was really smooth on the ipad and if you have been using iphone for long, I can imagine the first impression of an android phone lagging.
This responsiveness is one thing iphone users define as lag.

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 11:31

87. Quezdagreat (Posts: 428; Member since: 05 Apr 2012)


my ios 7 doesn't lag so....

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 17:41

110. Muzhhur (Posts: 260; Member since: 14 Sep 2012)


http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=4967&idPhone2=5437

Review this comparative bettween Nokia Lumia 920 and Nokia Lumia 928

iPhone 5S is no match for Lumia 920... obviously this resarch does not count

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 05:16 6

6. Mittal (Posts: 493; Member since: 14 Dec 2011)


chill bro! lag is due to other stuff also

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 05:33

10. UdhaiyaPrasanth (Posts: 76; Member since: 05 Sep 2012)


Oh God! That was purely unintentional. I was not supporting anybody. I just found the article (and the embedded video) informative.. I'm not, in any ways, responsible for the war that is about to break out. *Peace* :D

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 07:31 1

43. easymomo (Posts: 91; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)


I wonder who paid for this study beacause Human Brain "can process" data received by the eyes between 150 and 300 ms.
All the phones listed are under 140 ms ....

There is no way human brain can process data every 1ms

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 08:12

55. asulect (Posts: 131; Member since: 27 Aug 2012)


Where do you get that 150ms to 300ms number? Movies need about 25 frames per second to be smooth. Games need even more, about 30fps to 60 fps. Even at 25 frames per seconds, that's 1 frame every 40ms. 150ms is way too slow.

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 08:19

58. easymomo (Posts: 91; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)


just Google it
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3671355/

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 08:21

60. asulect (Posts: 131; Member since: 27 Aug 2012)


yeah. Just try to watch a movie with 3 frames per seconds and tell me how you feel.

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 08:31

66. easymomo (Posts: 91; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)


Why don't you ask google ? it is very simple. If you can read text in french language, read this

http://www.la-photo-en-faits.com/2012/10/vision-humaine-appareil-photo.html

Le temps mis le cerveau pour traiter l'information fournie par l'oeil se situe entre 150 ms et 300 ms.

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 08:18

57. asulect (Posts: 131; Member since: 27 Aug 2012)


150ms will translate into less than 7 frames per second. and 300ms translates into 3 frames per second. Those figures are way too slow for anything.

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 08:25

62. easymomo (Posts: 91; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)


Just google it, this is something I knew since long time ago, just ask google

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 08:27

64. asulect (Posts: 131; Member since: 27 Aug 2012)


It doesn't matter what you find in google, just use your common sense. Are you telling me your eyes and your brain cannot process more than 3 frames per second? I am sure my brain can.

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 08:34

68. easymomo (Posts: 91; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)


I'm telling you scientists in the world agree that human brain can process data from 150 to 300 ms.
It is very simple.
I'm talking about Scientists.

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 08:36 1

71. asulect (Posts: 131; Member since: 27 Aug 2012)


And I am telling you those numbers are wrong, at least in this context. 300ms is way too slow for watching any kind of movement on a screen.

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 08:56

78. easymomo (Posts: 91; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)


You've convinced me, even if jelly Bean is at 60FPS, the S4 screen won't be able to render it properly.
It's responsivness should be at around 16.66 ms to handle the FPS.

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 14:59

98. ardent1 (Posts: 2000; Member since: 16 Apr 2011)


Scientists once believed the world was flat.

Or, that the Earth is the center of (then known) universe as in the Sun revolved around the earth.

Here is one truism about science and scientific methodology, a scientific theory exists until a better comes along.

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 16:11 2

106. kassi (Posts: 109; Member since: 25 May 2013)


maybe you mistake that time with the human reaction time (time you need to click a button after a signal, which is around 100-400ms). otherwise your claim is comlete utter bullsh*t

posted on 02 Oct 2013, 16:20

125. easymomo (Posts: 91; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)


I was hoping to help some ignorant to know something new but it seems to hard for those people to use google to learn something new....

posted on 02 Oct 2013, 16:23

126. easymomo (Posts: 91; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)


http://www.la-photo-en-faits.com/2012/10/vision-humaine-appareil-photo.html If you are not only limited to english, read this

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 07:41 5

45. easymomo (Posts: 91; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)


Iphone 5 screen resolution: 640 x 1136 pixels
Galaxy S4 screen resolution: Full HD

For the Iphone 5 and Galaxy S4, the responsivness cannot be noticed by human brain, there are both too fast for the brain.

This study is just for Marketing

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 14:50

96. JunitoNH (Posts: 1896; Member since: 15 Feb 2012)


Yeah..........tell that to my Samsung Galaxy Nexus.

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 16:08

105. kassi (Posts: 109; Member since: 25 May 2013)


you are so dumb, lmao

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 08:30 1

65. icyrock1 (Posts: 307; Member since: 25 Mar 2013)


The theory is that, because iOS apps are programmed in Objective-C (which is closer to metal than what Windows Phone and Android apps are coded in) might be the reason why.

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 08:40 3

73. akki20892 (Posts: 3901; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)


Why not they compare lumia 920.

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 17:34

108. Muzhhur (Posts: 260; Member since: 14 Sep 2012)


the best screen on WP is on Lumia 920, this is just lag in research

posted on 01 Oct 2013, 05:10 10

2. tahnik (Posts: 188; Member since: 17 Jul 2011)


That is a big difference.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories