x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






iPhone 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S III drop test is not for faint-hearted geeks

0. phoneArena 21 Sep 2012, 09:38 posted on

One thing that we don't really enjoy watching is pricey gadgets being tortured, but if that's the only way to test the durability of a high-end smartphone, then count us in. Today's contenders are the iPhone 5, which is now available for purchase in several countries, and the Samsung Galaxy S III, which is currently among the hottest Android smartphones in existence...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 13:17

80. remtothemax (Posts: 260; Member since: 02 May 2012)


how is which hardware is better relevant?
if you make a phone that can perform a function with a processor from three years ago faster than the latest quad-core processor
i'm going to buy the one that works the best
not the one with the "best" specs
the gs3 has a faster processor and more ram
but i'm using the operating system, not just raw hardware
i care about how it works, not what's in it
okay, put 8 gigs of ram in, big whoop if it doesn't matter

and btw, i'm not commenting on jb and project butter and all that, which i am very excited about
i just think these stupid competitions about raw hardware are stupid
its like the megapixel war
its over, what matters now is features and performance
(which arguably android or even wp8 may win, that is subjective)

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 13:22

82. remtothemax (Posts: 260; Member since: 02 May 2012)


...so do you don't even use your phone in the real world where drops happen?
i think knowing the relative "drop resistance" of a phone is incredibly important to making a buying decision
they don't do just one of these, they do a lot

so the gs3 is more fragile, that isn't necessarily a deal breaker at all
but it is something i want to know when i am thinking about buying a phone and how accident prone i may or may not be

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 14:05 1

84. structureman116 (Posts: 140; Member since: 14 Sep 2010)


There is plenty for Apple to be ashamed of. They have a fast phone...but its AMAZING, REVOLUTIONARY and INNOVATIVE features have been around for over 2 years now on Android phones.

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 14:55

87. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)


Yes, I agree, important general result not separately OS or hardware. But we were talking exclusively about benchmark results and it is the fact that you can't benchmark hardware and compare results if devices are using different OS.

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 15:15

88. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)


"...so do you don't even use your phone in the real world where drops happen?"

Show me where I say that ???

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 15:19 2

91. EclipseGSX (Posts: 1731; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)


I've held 21g of coke before. It's not that heavy

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 19:39

93. remtothemax (Posts: 260; Member since: 02 May 2012)


that makes sense

neutral question: is there no real way to scientifically compare real world performance accross devices?
it just makes sense to me that if you have a test that times how long it takes to load a web page or how fast it takes to crunch some data set, wouldn't that be a pretty good indicator of real world performance, regardless of what operating system/hardware is there?

is this more of an issue of people not being able to program equally well across all platforms, resulting in test programs that perform better because they were programed better?

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 20:55

95. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)


"is this more of an issue of people not being able to program equally well across all platforms, resulting in test programs that perform better because they were programed better?"

OS A isn't equal to OS B because they are wrote differently in other words there is differences between iOS and Android "architectures". In programing world you can make same thing but in different ways and that's makes difference, one function may work faster than another written differently.

Example from mathematics:

1 + 2 + 3 = 6

3 x 2 = 6

Result he same but calculation is different. ;)

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 23:29

96. meowcenary (Posts: 187; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


A screen protector aid in scratch reduction and does not the reinforce the structural integrity of the glass display. One should always pay for insurance to cover damages. It is pitiful to see the cracks on peoples smartphones. If you can't afford insurance then you, should not own a smartphone. Either that or cut your starbucks or mcdonalds out.

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 23:56

97. prakesh (Posts: 92; Member since: 13 Sep 2012)


gs3 is under ICS gsmarena/PA says that it can run faster than ip5, when it upgrade to JB.

so ur comment sounds apple fan boy

posted on 22 Sep 2012, 00:00

98. prakesh (Posts: 92; Member since: 13 Sep 2012)


4/4s has a glass..

posted on 24 Sep 2012, 18:47

99. estreito (Posts: 15; Member since: 11 May 2012)


If you go now to the geekbench result browser, you'll see the the SGS3 is already faster, even with ICS.
The SGS3's are in the 1700's - 1800's and the iphone 5 is in the 1600's.
BTW, my SGS2 (Exynos), scores 1445 (OC'ed). :)

posted on 26 Sep 2012, 08:32

101. bayusuputra (Posts: 963; Member since: 12 Feb 2012)


actually, it's because of the weight, the glass' surface area, and the shape of the phone itself..

let me explain.

weight:
the heavier, the harder the impact, physics..

shape of the phone:
the iPhone 5 has metal sides which is stronger than the plastic sides of the SGS3 and a flat glass whereas the SGS3 has a "bubble" like glass, which means it will be the one that take the impact when it drops, unlike the metal sides of the iPhone which to some extent will still protect it..

Surface area of glass:
consider the glasses are of the same material, same thickness, same width but different length.
the one that is longer will have a lower strength. again, physics.

good job to apple for making it less prone to shattering like the previous iPhones..

But I still prefer Android..

posted on 27 Sep 2012, 16:13

102. bhsolace (Posts: 5; Member since: 12 Aug 2011)


Apple never completely invented computers or mp3 players, but they made them better. In this case, yes android had it first but apple made it better, these arguments are pointless.

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 09:43 4

2. wsker (Posts: 24; Member since: 02 Dec 2011)


Oh yeah, just "Throw" the SGS3 !

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 10:40

45. wendygarett (unregistered)


why? if you have it, just used it...

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 14:36

86. wsker (Posts: 24; Member since: 02 Dec 2011)


I meant like it wasn't fair Dx ... he just drops the iphone 5, and throws the SGS3 !

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 09:44 2

3. StephenGalop (Posts: 52; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)


What the f***... dropping it right after buying?

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 10:28

32. wendygarett (unregistered)


because of the ANDROIDauthority silly :D
they hate iphone too :D

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 09:44 12

4. bucky (Posts: 2866; Member since: 30 Sep 2009)


iPhone 5 seems to be built pretty well

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 10:31 1

35. wendygarett (unregistered)


Your phone will never be as slim as sturdy as iphone :)

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 10:34 1

37. tcy148 (Posts: 3; Member since: 19 Sep 2012)


I think the only phone to rival the iPhone 5 for build quality, slimness and lightness is the HTC One S. IMO, that is a beautifully crafted phone. Specs can't match the iPhone though.

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 10:35 2

40. bucky (Posts: 2866; Member since: 30 Sep 2009)


i dont get what ur saying wendy...

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 11:40 2

68. protozeloz (Posts: 5396; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)


neither do we bucky..... neither do we.....

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 09:44 2

5. ajac09 (Posts: 1482; Member since: 30 Sep 2009)


lol @ the old people in the background

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 09:45 1

6. andro. (Posts: 1999; Member since: 16 Sep 2011)


It toltally depends on the angle of impact. You can drop a device at the same height 5 times and it may not crack at all depending on its angle of impact or it may crack the very first time. If the iphone 5 is actually less fragile than its iphone 4$ alternative than apple could see alot of replacement iphone sales drop.

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 09:49 9

10. good2great (Posts: 1042; Member since: 22 Feb 2012)


Even remixfa gave the phone props bro... And he's one of the most respected android users here...

Give it a rest lol

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 09:52 2

13. StephenGalop (Posts: 52; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)


another fan screaming "unfair", "retest", "bias!"

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 10:38 2

43. remixfa (Posts: 14337; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


Aww, thanks

Ya gotta give it where its due man. We've laughed at every iteration of iphone before for how easily it shattered. It seems like they've put a little thought into this version. Unfortunately it looks like the opposite for Samsung who is known for great build quality/drop resistance. I guess "built by lawyers" means "built to withstand the impact of the court, not the floor". lol

posted on 21 Sep 2012, 11:07

56. VZWuser76 (Posts: 4620; Member since: 04 Mar 2010)


Technically they're both right. While apple has certainly improved he design in regards to durability (never understood a glass back on a phone when it's just painted anyway), that doesn't mean that it couldn't have just as easily gone the other way. When dealing with glass the main factors in shattering are height of the drop, area of the glass, angle of the drop, and weight of the device. Also, and I know this would've been expensive, for a truer test they should've done each segment with a new phone. Since the s3 was already cracked, it hurt it in the following test. Not saying the same thing wouldn't have happened anyway, but if it's already broken another impact will only further fracture it, whereas a new unit may have come out okay.

The main thing is you can drop a phone 100 times and no matter how hard you try you'll never get the drop exactly the same. Sometimes the phones in the video just dropped, other times (like when the s3 shattered) they hit and shot across the ground. Assuming the ground is fairly flat, a face down drop would be better than a corner drop, since the impact would be absorbed by a larger area than on a corner drop. I've cracked one screen (my OG Incredible) but that was after going down a half a flight of stairs and hitting the cement floor. The screen itself cracked, not the glass, and that was with a tpu case and screen protector on it. So really there is no rhyme or reason to why some phones crack and others don't. Certainly a smaller phone with less weight will fare better than a larger, heavier phone. In the end be careful and try to safeguard your phone. If you're super worried go with a case & screen protector, or insurance, or both. But at least now apple users have less to worry about.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories