x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close





Why some “4G” phones are not quite 4G

0. phoneArena 16 Sep 2011, 08:51 posted on

In today's state of the market, one of the most touted and sought-after features in phones is 4G. Indeed, the ability to take advantage of much faster data speeds, compared to what we had just a year ago, is nothing short of awesome...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 09:14 2

1. dhageorge (unregistered)


isn't this why ppl have been calling their 4G: "4G" right now. This is really non-news we had the definitions for all of these technologies and knew the specs of those phones. Thats why at&t as the "*with enhanced back haul" on the back of every HSPA+ device. So in at&t's mind with new "enhanced" back haul combined with HSPA+ will give people 4G like speeds. they actually laid it all out on their website:http://www.att.com/network/ nothing new really and AT&T didnt really hide anything and that was why i thought everyone was already bashing their 4G already as not being true 4G.

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 11:43 2

27. jogutier (Posts: 324; Member since: 12 Feb 2010)


I think AT&T taught us this back when they would put 3G on their phone that were only edge compatible. LOL!!!

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 09:15 5

2. bxKIDD (unregistered)


T-Mobile 3G/4G is still faster then everything else aside from VZW's LTE, and most of the times Sprint's horrible WiMax Service.

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 09:33 5

4. SF Steven (unregistered)


The fact that it's faster than everything else except VZW LTE isn't the point: they're advertising something that they're not delivering.

It's the same as a restaurant that offers a prime rib dinner that turns out to be gound beef with fillers and slathered in A-1 steak sauce, using the logic that "it's so much better than plain hamburger meat, we feel it's just as good as prime rib".

Or selling a car that gets 80mpg*
*as long as you're always driving downhill with the wind at your back, in teeny tiny print on page 10 of the paperwork from the car dealer.

The fact that it's better is irrelevant, the issue is that they're misrepresenting the product and benefitting from that. If they didn't get an increase in sales for 4G phones (vs. 3G), they wouldn't do it.

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 10:12

13. darth8ball (Posts: 520; Member since: 02 Aug 2011)


The precedent has been set in of all places Cable Television. Cablevision announces the fastest internet speeds, but no one gets those speeds. If both the system and user both meet under optimal conditions(never comes even close in reality) those speeds could be reached. that makes their claims possible however unlikely but still legal to advertise.
It is up to the consumer to be aware of just how probable those speeds actually happening are and if they are willing to pay for that chance. An informed consumer is their worst nightmare

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 12:19

33. bigdawg23 (Posts: 462; Member since: 25 May 2011)


Yes it maybe but they should classify it as "4G". To me these devices are 3.5G at best. Download on both AT&T and T-Mobile can be the same at VZW LTE in areas. My iPHone 4 runs faster than Sprints WiMax.

Now when it comes to LTE on VZW remember the use is up where HSPA, HSPA+ and WIMAX are.

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 12:27

35. p0rkguy (Posts: 685; Member since: 23 Nov 2010)


Actually all ISPs either provide a note saying that they are "capable" of those speeds or say speeds up to xxMbps/xxMbps.
Also, I get constant 12-15Mbps/2Mbps on OOL and already planning to upgrade to 50/8.

posted on 19 Sep 2011, 10:05

109. Laron (unregistered)


Who would thumb this down, it makes perfect logical sense.

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 09:22 1

3. SF Steven (unregistered)


I think this falls under "bait and switch" according to the FTC; I think highly publicized lawsuit(s) would be the best way to force carriers to be honest...unfortunately, I bet most carriers lock customers into arbitration to settle disputes, preventing class-action suits.

It's their world, we just live in it.

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 09:43

5. Chakra (Posts: 134; Member since: 02 Dec 2009)


I agree, I think the FTC should sue these companies for unfair trade practices. Why they don't is beyond me. They are literally lying to millions of people. Thousands of companies are sued for much less than that.

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 09:44

6. PimpStrong (Posts: 310; Member since: 25 Jul 2011)


I just wish they didn't say "4G LTE". One or the other should suffice.

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 09:44 3

7. Alantef (Posts: 288; Member since: 14 Sep 2011)


Verizon is by far the fastest! i used it to get online with the PS3 second is easily T-Mobile which isn't slow at all but it gets the job done and last is a tie...at&t sucks and not anywhere near the top two and sprint is not only slow but you CANT stay in 4G for a good amount of time

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 10:56

20. darth8ball (Posts: 520; Member since: 02 Aug 2011)


AT&T has been accused by the FCC of overloading data spectrum while they are pleading to have the Tmo merger go through. They also have unused spectrum they purchased last year and I think they are holding on incase the merger isn't approved.

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 09:49

8. snowgator (Posts: 3604; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)


I have gotten to the point where I ignore the 4G designation, or at least belittle it. There is 3G, what I refer to as 3G+ when the 4G comes up in conversation, WiMAX, and LTE. LTE stands alone, and I make sure everyone who asks me about phones knows it. I have gone out of my way to talk speeds, not designations,

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 10:12

14. remixfa (Posts: 14586; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


when it comes to real world average speeds, VZW is only ever so slightly faster than Tmobile. For 60% less and no overages, I'll take Tmobile. :)

Wimax is as slow as it gets for most of the people (exept for ATTs fake 4g), since the clearwire networks are oversaturated which slows it down.

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 10:44 2

17. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)


Remix how is that possible when theoretical speeds on T-Mo are 21.1 and 100 on LTE?

AT&T's fake 4G is HSPA+ just like T-Mo and they're launching LTE this month was it? T-Mo is way behind in this area.

Also in this article T-Mo actually admits to false advertising.

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 11:22 3

24. remixfa (Posts: 14586; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


because like always, your an illinformed dodo.

the top speeds on Tmobile right now are 42mbs, with a real world in the mid 20s to low 30s that ive seen on the data cards. (since we dont have a phone yet that does 42mb/s)
The top speeds seen on VZW have been in the 30s in actual usage.


LTE-ADVANCED is 100mb/s, which is NOT what VZW uses

we have now had this conversation like a dozen times and you still cling to misinformation. wake up. geeze.

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 12:00

30. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)


LTE advanced has theoretical of 1gbps an real world of 100mbps or higher. How many times do you have to be proven wrong?

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 12:09

31. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)


"Besides the peak data rate 1 Gbit/s that fully supports the 4G"

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LTE_Advanced

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 12:54 1

40. remixfa (Posts: 14586; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


it is NOT WHAT VZW USES YOU ILLITERATE DODO.

Geeeeeeeezus.. how many times a day do your parents smack you for not listening..


," it was only the next-generation LTE-Advanced and WiMAX 2 technologies that were considered 4G, due to their ability to offer download throughputs of about 100 Mbit/s"

its even in the article.. learn to READ. NEXT GENERATION.. AS IN.. NOT THIS ONE! There is no such thing as LTE-Advanced on ANY carrier nor Wimax2 yet!

VZW uses LTE basic. Its not gonna get any faster until they pop it up to LTE advance which isnt supposed to be sometime after 2015 when the network is fully on LTE. In that same time period, IF tmobile still exists they are planning 84mbs by NEXT YEAR. VZWs speeds arent going to get faster than the 7-30mb/s they get now for a few years.

As of right now in actual speed tests with a 42mb/s card on Tmobile vs an LTE one on VZW, they are both within the same ballpark with VZW taking a slight lead.

Either wich way, that shyt is fast.

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 13:36

48. biophone (Posts: 1994; Member since: 15 Jun 2011)


http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizons-melone-fires-back-t-mobile-4g-war-words/2011-01-10

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 13:56

51. remixfa (Posts: 14586; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


bio,
2 things

1) that article is nearly a year old, out of date, and no longer relevant. both networks have sped up quite a bit since then

2) thats from a VZW exec. you expect him to praise HSPA+ from a competitor? LTE is the better technology over all for the future, noone is arguing that. We are talking about speed.

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 14:22

55. biophone (Posts: 1994; Member since: 15 Jun 2011)


Well yea i know its a bit old but what it is saying is still valid. Tmobile is speeding up its hspa+ network as much as it can because it doesnt have the funds to invest in lte. So right now it may be almost as fast but in a few years from now it will demolished by lte. Then only existing vzw customers will get unlimited. So in the long run its just better to stick with verizon while they develop the best lte network in america. They got a head start and the coverage will be great.

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 14:48

56. remixfa (Posts: 14586; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


U think VZW is going back to unlimited? They were talking about getting away from unlimited when I worked there in 07. Unlimited is bad for the provider. No extra charges and more network congestion. Its only good for us, the consumer. And with the probably Tmo/ATT merger, sprint will be the lone "unlimited" guy left, so what is the market pressure to go back to it? Nearly none unless you see a huge shift to Sprint, but thats unlikely at the moment.


Next year (if tmobile is around), they are upgrading to 84mb/s That is a full 3-4 years before VZW is scheduled to switch on 100mb/s LTE Advanced, which should be some time after 2015 when the entire network is on LTE and they are trying to get rid of CDMA. Not to mention when your NOT on "4g", tmobile's 3g DEMOLISHES VZWs CDMA "3g".. 7.2 vs 1.5mbs.

So will EVENTUALLY VZW "Demolish" Tmobile (if they are still here).. yes. But if you wanna pay 60% more a month for ever so slightly faster service (we will see after the Hercules launches how it fares on 42mbs) in the hopes that 4 years down the line it will be faster.. thats up to you.

Concidering that the 2 year contract disparity between Tmo and VZW ($60 vs $130+) is almost $1700, in 4 years thats $3400 difference. Thats a down payment for a decent car.

If you get good coverage from both carriers, why is it a good idea to stick with VZW again? As long as I get good coverage where i live, work, and play, i see absolutely no reason to leave Tmobile even if I didnt work here.

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 14:50

58. Whateverman (Posts: 3284; Member since: 17 May 2009)


What plan makes T Mobile 60% cheaper? There's no denying they are cheaper, but that sounds a bit high.

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 14:58

59. Whateverman (Posts: 3284; Member since: 17 May 2009)


Never mind. Just looked it up, and yeah. VZW has no defense against that kinda pricing! And I love VZW, so that's a bitter pill to swallow.

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 15:09

62. biophone (Posts: 1994; Member since: 15 Jun 2011)


No what i am saying is people who have unlimited with verizon now will lose it by going to tmobile. Also you can get your prices reduced with verizon when you argue with them as I have done. Also they give other discounts. For example I had 20 per month for unlimited internet. Also i bet you the tmobile sgs2 will have problems for sure. Why you ask because they are debuting it on the 42 mb network which is very new. LTE advanced will demolish hspa+ in terms of speed and coverage and I am sure verizon will get it up once there basic lte coverage is throughout the nation rock solid.

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 15:40

66. remixfa (Posts: 14586; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


Value plan. Unlimited talk text and 2gig of 4g data before throttle.. 59.99 :) 5 gigs for 70 VZW is 130 or 140 for 4gig of data plus overage (too lazy to look it up ATM lol).

which is why my point continues to be, if both are blazing fast, and both have full service where you live, why WOULDNT you be on Tmobile instead of VZW?

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 15:45

67. remixfa (Posts: 14586; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


Tmobile is unlimited , it just throttles down. And for the price disparity you can get a 10 gig 4g plan on tmobile and still save money, so its still in Tmo's favor.

The 42mb/s network has been running flawlessly since late july.

Reduced VZW prices = still higher than Tmobile prices.


VZW will eventually force people off of grandfathered plans. They do it all the time "if you want to upgrade, you must go to a new plan as these new phones arent compatible with old plans" (AKA, they dissallow certain "granfathered features" to be placed on newer phones). They did it while I was there and they sure arent going to stop. All carriers do that.. except maybe Tmobile. Ive seen people on 12 year old powertell plans. Of course, they were non-data plans so maybe that was the difference.


Again, your talking 2015 at the earliest before LTE-A gets dropped on VZW. Tmo's 84mbs network will be up by mid 2012 if the merger doesnt happen.

posted on 16 Sep 2011, 15:47

68. remixfa (Posts: 14586; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


I love VZW as well. They are the best company for total coverage and speed if you live in a LTE area. If im not on Tmo, ill be back on VZW. But if they both work in your area, why the heck would you pay the price difference? Just to brag that you pay more?? lol

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories