Nokia C6-00 Specifications
source: PortableGear, BeGeek (translated)
2. jrcrow79 (Posts: 477; Member since: 02 May 2008)
WHY..are Nokia phones sooo boring like a blackberry...Symbian really?..10yrs later..like Chrysler making a car compared to the original 20yrs ago!..Bada I thought was gonna show up more often..guess not
3. thatdude1 (unregistered)
So boring, but still #1 in the world. Guess it's not as boring as you thought.
5. pathmarkpolice (Posts: 102; Member since: 05 Feb 2009)
Nokia's low to mid-range phones are number one in the world. Their smartphones...not so much. Look at the growth of Android handsets. Have you owned an android phone and then owned a media centric nokia smartphone? The difference is night and day man. I bought the n900 for a ridiculously high when it first came out. I had it for a couple of months and yes it was a good phone. But it took Nokia forever to come out with updates for the device. Look at android, froyo isn't even on all devices, and Google's already working on a 3.0 update. The N900, after coming out in November, still doesn't have a basic portrait view throughout the entire interface of the phone. It's thick as a brick, and doesn't even sync over the air with nokia's OWN OVI SERVICE! It's ridiculous that Nokia doesn't even provide support with their own awesome phones. Symbian is older than the bible, and yes, a few years ago it was great, and yes it TECHNICALLY still does all the things modern smartphones do, and did more than the iPhone when it first came out. But now, newer mobile OS's have caught up to Symbian and do what it did better, faster, more efficiently, with less headache, and, at the more superficial, it does it prettier. One thing I do give to Nokia is that their low range phones are great, the dual sim C2-00 is a great basic phone. But their high end line up is in shambles, they're just riding the coat tails of their more dominant years and if they don't do something drastic, then they will be swept up by Android and the iPhone.
4. jack395 (Posts: 23; Member since: 18 Jul 2010)
Pls correct the labeling on the back of c6: it reads c6-01.