Which one of the new Kindle Fires you like best?
Share:
- Which one of the new Kindles you like best?
-
6.91%
36 votes Amazon Kindle Fire for $159, best bang for the buck -
31.67%
165 votes Amazon Kindle Fire HD 7-inch for $199, high-res screen and 8GB more memory than Nexus 7! -
49.14%
256 votes Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9-inch for $299, unmatched super high-res screen for a low price! -
12.28%
64 votes Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9-inch with LTE for $499 and a $50 LTE data plan for a year. That's right, a year!
521 votes
Share:
Amazon Kindle Fire HD first promo videos surface 
Amazon introduces X-Ray technology for its new Kindle Fires 
-
Screenshots from Sony Xperia ZU prototype confirm specs
-
Microsoft and Nokia reportedly end merger negotiations
-
First phone with flexible screen coming by the end of the year
-
Huawei Ascend D2 surprisingly scores as best 1080p LCD display, beats HTC One, Sony Xperia Z
-
HTC Butterfly S is announced
-
Alleged iPhone 5S display front pops up in high resolution
12 Comments
2. robocopvn posted on 06 Sep 2012, 15:41 0
yes, of course. If you check amazon website you'll see there is 8gb for kindlefire2, 16GB or 32GB for 7'' and 8.9'' HD WIFI, and 32gb or 64gb for 8.9 HD 4GLTE
3. robocopvn posted on 06 Sep 2012, 15:43 3
And I think Amazonis really the company care about the service and quality, not the profit. Like some try to say the same thing but their so-high profit margin betrays them lolz !
7. Zayuh24 posted on 06 Sep 2012, 17:31 0
Exactly! They won't make a profit from the 7" devices, but they'll definitely make some from the content. With the new contracts to show episodes of nearly EVERY show you can think of, as well as the growth of their current app-ecosystem, I can see Amazon keeping a good piece of their pie.
9. SlimSoulja86 posted on 07 Sep 2012, 04:35 0
LOL, let's just be honest here, I have no beef against Amazon, but let us not be too gullible here. Ever company wants to make profit, it's how you market yourself, and how you persuade consumers to buy your product and how you want them to view your organisation. In this case Amazon wants consumers to view them as an organisation that deosn't cae about profits, which convinces you that they really care about you. Amazon will make profit from their devices one way or another, in this case, they allure you into buying thier device and in turn, you will be locked into paying for their service. As a marketing student, believe me, I know. And yes Amazon it's more of a Customer Orientated company, which means they strive to please their customers' needs, in turn makes their consumers feels special.
This is just a marketing scheme, and believe me it's not a bad thing, as every company have one. And every product has USP (Unique Selling Point) and for the Kindle Fires, it's that the products are of high quality with low prices, and best services afterwards.
But to say Amazon doesn't care about profit it's just bn too gullible. Every company survives on Profit, thats what all the stakeholders care about. Unless if Amazon it's a Non-Profit Organization. Then, yeah, they would not care about profit
Just saying.
10. robocopvn posted on 07 Sep 2012, 09:29 0
I know, my major is marketing. But the way amazon doing business really make customers satisfy. I am, the person living outside US. But I already buy many stuff on amazon and to be a user of the original kindle fire. Honestly, they serve the me the way no other company does ever !
4. sgtdisturbed47 posted on 06 Sep 2012, 16:04 4
The Nexus 7 will easily outperform the Fire.
I was glad to get rid of my Fire after owning it for a month.
5. ap1989 posted on 06 Sep 2012, 16:21 4
None, Nexus 7 is better it has Quad core i wouldnt spend $500 for a Knidle fire hd LTE i would rather get a iPad
6. rasinhussy posted on 06 Sep 2012, 17:00 4
Yes, you could get a 16GB WIFI only iPad for $500.
12. skymitch89 posted on 07 Sep 2012, 13:47 1
Tough choice. GNote 2 so I can have a phone and a tablet, or keep my smartphone and get a Kindle Fire HD 7 and carry around 2 devices. I think that I'll just wait and see.
