x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






Which carrier offers the fastest mobile data and coverage: 4G / 3G speed comparison

0. phoneArena 19 Mar 2014, 10:50 posted on

4G LTE has brought blazingly fast Internet to our mobile devices with speeds often even higher than what home Internet connections offer, but different carriers deliver vastly different speeds…

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 11:56 1

15. true1984 (Posts: 825; Member since: 23 May 2012)


wrong. spark is 800Mhz, 1900Mhz, and 2.5Ghz. its tri-band

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 14:42 3

35. Joshua9007 (Posts: 90; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)


There is a lot more to spark than just the 2.5Ghz frequency (which will eventually allow the TDD-LTE 20Mhz channels to be bonded together with LTE-Advanced and offer theoretical speeds of over 2Gb/s)

Spark will be the tri-band service brand name, but many areas that are not urban areas and 2.5Ghz will not allow blanket coverage, will still get the 800Mhz LTE service. Which will not only help with coverage and in-building service, but in the majority of the country will be another 5x5Mhz LTE carrier which doubles the capacity of their current 5x5Mhz PCS 1900Mhz service. Along with that there are areas that will have the ability to re-purpose some existing PCS spectrum for LTE as well.

This article uses speed tests on an incomplete network for sprint, as many of these areas only have 50% of the towers with LTE on the first PCS band, and tests were conducted before spark was even deployed.

What the moral of this story is that Sprint will be very competitive in areas where they have service once all of these measures are in place. And I can't wait to see the landscape after another 6mo.

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 18:41

53. tuminatr (Posts: 774; Member since: 23 Feb 2009)


exactley I have seen where they have come to in the last six months it will be interisting

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 11:14

5. youlookfoolish (Posts: 174; Member since: 14 Dec 2012)


Rain is wet, the sky is blue....

Another click bait article in the same vein as the dumb latency article yesterday. It just riles up fan boys and gives T-Mobile fans in particular reason to bark over something that is common knowledge and no one cares about.

NoFanboy said it best. What good is fast when it is in few places? T-Mobile hopes to cover 230 million by 2014? The fastest reaches the fewest. Like I said, rain is wet. We all know this.

So T-Mobile fans are proud to jump in their fast corvettes. Too bad they may not make it to a gas station. As everyone else will tell them. And the same old arguments and points will be made. Dumb. This article sucks.

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 11:22 7

8. Augustine (Posts: 1043; Member since: 28 Sep 2013)


I'm no fanboy. I'd switch from T-mobile in heartbeat for another good deal. But as long as T-mobile serves me in the few places that matter to me and where I live, I couldn't care less that a carrier covers other 304,999,999 people.

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 13:19 2

25. jroc74 (Posts: 6015; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)


Exactly.

Every carrier has dead zones....even the mighty Verizon. I lived n worked in a Verizon dead zone for years.

That being said.....Sprint and T Mo were sporadic at best in my area. A female co worker could use her Sprint EVO in a hallway at work where my 2 Motorola phones wouldnt work. Its like there was a Sprint tower on the building.

At my apt a different story...and I lived a few miles from work. I will give Verizon credit for consistency...but 3G speeds will go to GSM networks now unless Verizon upgrades their 3G network. And AT&T might have had better reception in my area...my PS Vita could get online with 3G better than any Verizon phone I had. That inluded 3 Moto phones.....the arguable king of phone reception...or one of the kings....

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 16:01 1

40. lsutigers (Posts: 820; Member since: 08 Mar 2009)


It's very possible. Depending on who your company uses for wireless service and how many lines they have, many times the carrier will install a signal booster (femtocell) device to provide better coverage. Sprint has a ton of business/enterprise/government customers so it's probable.

posted on 20 Mar 2014, 08:12

77. jroc74 (Posts: 6015; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)


Didnt know that...interesting.

And I did work in a govt building. Makes sense.

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 12:06 8

18. g2a5b0e (Posts: 3725; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)


It's funny how the article suddenly becomes "click bait" & sucks when it doesn't reflect the results you want to hear. No surprises here.

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 16:19

46. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)


Lol right?

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 13:38 5

29. DigitalJedi_X2 (banned) (Posts: 346; Member since: 30 Jan 2012)


So it's click bait when your precious Sprint isn't looking so good huh? Typical fanboy attitude. Loves to call everyone a fanboy and yet doesn't realize he's the biggest fanboy of them all.

Anyway, like others have been saying, who cares if your carrier doesn't get great service where you don't live and do business? I'm out in Rochester NY and get excellent coverage from T-Mobile. I couldn't care less if there's no coverage in Nowheresville, Alabama because I don't live there and don't plan on ever going.

If your carrier works great in your area then that's all you need to really worry about.

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 13:42

30. g2a5b0e (Posts: 3725; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)


You hit the nail on the head as usual, Jedi. +100

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 13:50

31. DigitalJedi_X2 (banned) (Posts: 346; Member since: 30 Jan 2012)


Thanks g2a5b0e!

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 16:09

42. lsutigers (Posts: 820; Member since: 08 Mar 2009)


Dude Sprint and Verizon are close when it comes to data speeds about 1mbps average difference and this does not count Sprint Spark.

Nationwide avg for TMO is 8.1, VZW is 5.59 and Sprint is 4.62. Not a big difference in the grand scheme of things. Not to mention that coverage wise, Sprint, not to mention VZW are way ahead of TMO.

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 16:20

48. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)


You literally missed his point. Literally.

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 11:20

7. Augustine (Posts: 1043; Member since: 28 Sep 2013)


Besides the obvious ranking, I noticed a few curious things.

One is that the 4G upload speed at T-mobile is roughly the same as its 3G upload speed.

Another is that in San Diego, the home of CDMA's inventor, Qualcomm, the CDMA carriers, Sprint and Verizon, stink badly.

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 11:29

10. Tuxedo (Posts: 350; Member since: 19 Mar 2013)


Where is PR on the Verizon map? lol

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 16:21

49. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)


Good question. I'll admit T-Mobile isn't the greatest in PR, but I can always use a AT&T Go! phone and only use it for a few days.

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 11:52 3

14. PBXtech (Posts: 1032; Member since: 21 Oct 2013)


Bottom maps are extremely misleading. While it's true about LTE, when you factor in the other 4G network types, you get a totally different picture. T-Mobile's HSPA+ network, for example, has great speeds but isn't included in the LTE coverage shown above.

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 14:01

32. Augustine (Posts: 1043; Member since: 28 Sep 2013)


I wondered about that myself. Are the HSPA+ results folded into 3G, thus placing T-mobile in the lead?

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 14:51

36. PBXtech (Posts: 1032; Member since: 21 Oct 2013)


I think the results shown above are pure LTE. They received a ton of money from AT&T and sunk it into their network, covering the major cities with their new LTE roll out.

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 12:00

16. aditya.k (Posts: 495; Member since: 10 Mar 2013)


So it means your downloads speed will be like 1MB/sec? I get that here in India with 3G. Or is there something that I'm confused about? :/

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 12:09 1

19. mike2959 (Posts: 563; Member since: 08 Oct 2011)


Couple factoids...
These are the actual city's, not metropolitan outlying suburbs, which is where the people live. The decline of almost every population of every city in this country is right in the census.
Point is, do the speed test in the top 20 suburbs.
Also at the end of tthe day it's about footprint of coverage, it's nice you can say that you have 90% of New York covered, but it's in 5 cities.

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 12:25

21. Adammcc (Posts: 6; Member since: 19 Mar 2014)


I'm pushing 65 Mb/s in Cadada on LTE??? 5-9mb on 3G. whats up with that??
here is a speed test :)

vww.speedtest.net/my-result/a/568047740

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 12:54 1

23. RandomUsername (Posts: 808; Member since: 29 Oct 2013)


I hate it when they market HSPA+ (3.9G) as LTE or 4G. Just wanted to throw that out there.

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 13:21

26. jroc74 (Posts: 6015; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)


I agree. It was understandable before LTE rolled out. But now? Its not necessary anymore.

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 13:22

27. zennacko (Posts: 237; Member since: 16 Jun 2013)


T-Mo's network proven solid once again, yet another point to Legere and da gang. People may complain about upload speeds but the upload bandwidth is used for:

*Uploading your vines, instagram selfies
*...And your data to the almighty eye of US Government
* Your messaging apps
* Hangouts or Skype calls (live conferences)

Except for live conferences, 2mbps upload should be more than enough. Sprint needs to use that excessive UL bandwidth for downloads IMO, nobody really needs more than 5mbps on a cell phone, it's overkill.

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 13:35 3

28. genkidama20 (Posts: 52; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)


From experience, switching from Verizon to T-Mo this month, I have not missed Verizon's coverage. In fact, I seem to get slightly better speeds with T-Mo. So, these charts are fairly accurate. The only thing I've noticed is my monthly bill went down DRAMATICALLY.

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 14:09

33. networkdood (Posts: 6330; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)


I switched to T no in December...best value network for the best value phone (Nexus 5)...

posted on 19 Mar 2014, 15:07

37. darthwho (Posts: 5; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)


I live in Los Angeles I switched from Verizon to TMO and I get better speeds plus a bill that's is half of what I was paying and unlimited data. I hardly ever travel so I really will not miss Verizon with their overpriced network.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories