What feature is used most on a cellphone? Hint: say cheese
0. phoneArena 28 Nov 2012, 01:16 posted on
The latest study from Pew Internet shows that a whopping 82% of cellphone owners use the camera on their handset, slightly beating out the percentage that use their device to text; online banking was last, used by just 29% of cellphone users...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. syedzain (Posts: 175; Member since: 08 Oct 2012)
well if thats the case, iphone has a better camera.
Note : i like apple.. but changed to android,purchased galaxy nexus 4.. 4.2 brought a lot of lag.. now i am selling my nexus 4.. anyone interested do contact me.
buying an iphone 5 .
5. XPERIA-KNIGHT (unregistered)
how much you letting the nexus go for? I might be interested
you can let me know at my gmail
8. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)
Yeah, but I bet those pics don't stay on the phone all that long. I suspect the pics get shared before 12 hours pass. If my theory is correct, the radio (cellular or WiFi) is the most heavily used feature....
13. SleepingOz (unregistered)
Galaxy Nexus 4? Sounds like a cheap chinese KIRF.
3. Commentator (Posts: 3137; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)
Funny there isn't a statistic on what percentage uses their phones for phone-calls.
14. speed4evr (Posts: 79; Member since: 05 Oct 2011)
I rarely use my phone for calls now days, mainly texts, FB, and email
4. bohdan4ik13 (Posts: 102; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)
Let's say Gaming may be on the first place, because almost everyone plays games on their device.
6. Commentator (Posts: 3137; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)
Maybe, but I would've also thought that almost everyone surfs the internet on their device too.
7. eisenbricher (Posts: 973; Member since: 09 Aug 2012)
Not necessarily. Interest in games fade away as you grow up. I've played quite a huge share till now, and I already can see it.
Also if you play REAL games on desktop/console, like Skyrim, CoD, WoW, Starcraft there's very less chance that those phone games would provide you that much entertainment. I mean, there's no comparison at all.
15. Commentator (Posts: 3137; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)
Not to single you out or anything, but I'm getting pretty tired of the elitist notion that mobile games are not "real games." Tell that to the developers making hundreds of millions of dollarson the App Store and Play Store.
16. eisenbricher (Posts: 973; Member since: 09 Aug 2012)
I'm just stating that fact. Mobile devices can't handle the sheer amount of processing yet. It doesn't mean that the mobile games shouldn't sell well.
17. Commentator (Posts: 3137; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)
Well, you implied that mobile games are NOT REAL, which, by the definition of a game, is not fact.
18. eisenbricher (Posts: 973; Member since: 09 Aug 2012)
I mean, nearer experience to the real world. Complex game engines these days make the games look so real, almost like real world. For example you can try playing Skyrim in Ultra mode, with a sufficiently large display. Can't overlook that feeling!!
20. Commentator (Posts: 3137; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)
But I don't subscribe to the idea that better graphics and more accurate physics engines equal a better game. There are times when I would much rather play Jetpack Joyride than Battlefield 3.
22. eisenbricher (Posts: 973; Member since: 09 Aug 2012)
Then you are't making sense. You can't compare two different games that way...
Correct way would be, imagine a slimmed down version of BF3 on phone, or a total eye-candied version of Jetpack Joyride on console. Or, any NFS on PC, and on phone. Tell me which one would you prefer. Portability of device aside, that isn't my focus.
23. Commentator (Posts: 3137; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)
If your focus isn't on portability (or ease of use) then you've missed the point entirely.
And I sure as hell can compare them that way. I think the NES Super Mario World looks a damn sight better than the new Wii version, despite all its newfangled graphics. I honestly couldn't say whether I'd like a souped-up version of JPJR, but I love its simplistic graphics as is, and I sure wouldn't play it on a console or PC; having it on my phone is way more convenient. And I wouldn't like BF3 on a phone because FPSs suck on phones anyways, no matter how good the graphics (using a touchscreen to aim, move and shoot is not fun). Some games are meant for mobile, and some are meant for PCs and consoles. To state that "real" games are better than mobile games because of their higher graphical ability is like saying an airplane is better than a car because it can fly... But what if where I'm going is just 2 miles down the road? A car is obviously a better choice, and an airplane would be useless, confusing and wasteful.
9. tiara6918 (Posts: 1946; Member since: 26 Apr 2012)
No surprises here, even a feature phone's camera is mostly used
10. Thephonegeek (Posts: 118; Member since: 22 Nov 2012)
Say cheeeeeeee....................eeeeeeeeeee@%*#sssre while using panorama.
11. phil2n (Posts: 487; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)
Then my Lumia 920 will be the best if i want a Say Cheese..
19. bluescreen (Posts: 154; Member since: 22 Nov 2012)
i'd have to say the send/end call button are running in a dead heat for 1st place on a phone before the camera button...isnt that still a feature :P
21. pliskin1 (Posts: 59; Member since: 17 Oct 2012)
So speech recognition is the most used feature?