Wednesday's News Bits
0. phoneArena posted on 10 Jun 2009, 10:08
Verizon picks the BlackBerry Storm to fight the Palm Pre, a new version of the LG ARENA might surprise you, the Nokia N86 8GB is now shipping and more…
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. igor550 posted on 20 Oct 2010, 01:43 0 0
Who cares about all that? They all need to work on wireless rate plans.
3. PapaJay224 posted on 10 Jun 2009, 14:59 0 0
"Verizon is to use the BlackBerry Storm as a competitor for the Pre. It looks like the Storm will be Big Red’s “secret” weapon against Sprint’s Pre, judging by leaked documents, sent to Verizon sales agents." Nice job Phone Arena, this article is a waist of time, the Pre is to compete with the Storm we use comparison sheets all the time, your article makes it seem like we're coming out with another Storm. OBVIOUSLY Storm Pre and iPhone are ALL in it to win it.. But Secret weapon....cmon who ever wrote this article should read a book...
6. ICanAffordVZW posted on 10 Jun 2009, 22:50 0 0
Just more obvious bias AGAINST big red. Maybe if we get an iPhone, the "editors" on the phonearena staff will like us..:(
7. ICanAffordVZW posted on 10 Jun 2009, 22:52 0 0
...and that is why your name is effing igor...because you are effing retarded. If the carriers lowered their prices then the only new phones that would be out would be LG-VX3450L's...lol
2. metalpoet posted on 10 Jun 2009, 14:47 0 0
true if all carriers lowered the prices of all of there plans then there can true sales competition between carriers as to which have the best cell phones and best customer service.
4. Kiltlifter posted on 10 Jun 2009, 20:44 0 0
If you lower your prices too low you cannot cover costs. You are stupid. Cell phones have nothing to do with it, becuase the govt could step in and say that all phones need to be cross compatible with all carriers... what now smart guy? oh that's right the phone is pointless. VZW and AT&T charge more for a reason. they are product differentiators, as in their networks are superior to their rivals in the US (Sprint and T-mobile respectively). Sprint used to charge more than anyone else back in the day, but their CEOs were greedy little bastards and just kept the bulk of the profts for themselves, while VZW kept investing more and more into its network, and now their network is considered waaaaay better than Sprint's. AT&T also invests a ton into its network, launching 3g isn't cheap and making it available isn't either, then releasing the 7.2 costs more... while tmobile's 3g coverage is laughable at best. Do you want cheap, or do you want good?
5. Kiltlifter posted on 10 Jun 2009, 20:46 0 0
Besides... your statement doesn't make any sense at all? Relearn 4th grade english and correct what i guess is supposed to be a fluid sentence. "true if all carriers lowered the prices of all of **there** plans then there (what does this mean--->)[can true sales competition between carriers ]"
