WSJ: Expect the rugged Samsung Galaxy S4 Active in July
0. phoneArena 26 Apr 2013, 15:43 posted on
Earlier this week, we told you that Young Soo Kim,the President of Samsung Gulf, had confirmed the existence of a "rugged" version of the Samsung Galaxy S4; Friday's edition of the Wall Street Journal contained more information on the phone which is being called the Samsung Galaxy S4 Active and will be water and dust proof...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. HDShatter (Posts: 1014; Member since: 17 Jan 2013)
Hopefully this becomes normal on all new smartphones in the next few years. The phones are thin enough, now make them durable.
3. buccob (Posts: 960; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)
Agree... I think the norm will be to nano-coat them like P2i and additional certification such as IPX7 will come for different devices...
Manufacturers should adopt P2i tech (or similar) like they have adopted Corning Gorilla Glasses
7. jcarrigan (unregistered)
Now THAT i would get :)
2. buccob (Posts: 960; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)
Are they honoring the legendary Xperia Active?
Respect for Sammy if they can pull a waterproof and rugged device while keeping S4 style...
I still like Sony's waterproof phones over Motos or Galaxy Xcover line
4. a_merryman (Posts: 509; Member since: 14 Dec 2011)
The look and feel of a Galaxy phone is about the only thing I want Samsung to get rid of....
5. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 2957; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)
Okay, so there's:
GS4 Exynos 5 Duos
GS4 Exynos 5
GS4 Snapdragon 600
GS4 Snapdragon 600 duos coming too?
6. ahhxd717 (Posts: 297; Member since: 08 Dec 2011)
Kudos to Samsung. Hopefully this will become a new standard in high end phones, like HDShatter mentioned. I hate worrying about water damage.
8. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 1113; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
are you kidding me become a new standard in high end phone, the standard has been set by Sony, and samsung is not the first manufaturer who uses nanocoating technology from P2i.
So samsung not set any standard
10. ahhxd717 (Posts: 297; Member since: 08 Dec 2011)
Dude, what the hell is your problem? Chill out. No, it's not a standard now, it's a bonus feature. I just like that Samsung has taken hint from Sony. I never said Samsung set any standard. Jesus f**king Christ, get a damn grip dude. Once the majority of phone starts using this, then it will be a standard. I swear, you people on here are brain dead.
12. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 1113; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
haha you said ''NEW STANDARD'' how can it be ''new'' when there is another device has set the standard, its not standard now but the standard has been set.
Ok about samsung is my mistake but you need worrying another things beside water damage because once again fragile Aluminium Iphone 5 beat S4 in drop test even GG3 not helping at all
11. kclgphilsbsa (Posts: 762; Member since: 21 Jan 2013)
nye, ddnt u read between d lines?? all flourish from you is ur hate
13. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 1113; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
ooh yes i hate samsung build quality so bad, and thats is my personal experience from GS2 and GY.
I'm soorry dude GG3 is not helping S4 in drop test even ''fragile'' Iphone 5 beat Samsung once again
9. snowgator (Posts: 3149; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)
Rugged. I want top end rugged. I understand it will mean a few trade-offs, but really. How many of us that work in factories, construction, manufacturing, and about one hundred other jobs buy a nice device and have to buy a big ticket case to protect it?
Love this story. Step in the right direction.
14. Supaheight (Posts: 66; Member since: 29 Sep 2012)
I also think that ruuged devices should now be as frequent as bluetooth in a phone or a tablet