WHO says cell phones are a cancer risk
0. phoneArena 31 May 2011, 13:18 posted on
The World Health Organization has placed mobile phones in the same "carcinogenic hazard" list as engine exhaust fumes, lead and chloroform; 31 scientists from 14 countries proclaimed that cell phone usage is "possibly carcinogenic to humans"...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. Yo (unregistered)
I keep my phone in my pocket all the time. Hope my genitals don't catch cancer!
2. Rawrzellers (Posts: 224; Member since: 22 Aug 2010)
They're really trying to make us afraid of everything aren't they? They failed to mention the study that tried to prove this, and actually proved that cell phones prevented Alzheimers. Did you know the sun gives people skin cancer? Guess we'll just have to never go outside and buy super duper special sunscreen :/ There is danger in everything so if you're really concerned about getting cancer from your cell phone then throw it away.
6. Controversy. (unregistered)
The real moral of anything like this is to raise awareness and add some truth to these issues. Even more so, the problem is more or less only going to affect those who heavily use their cellphones. As the same with the Sun, we should not go outside while the Sun is at its brightest and not for extended periods of time.
3. MorePhonesThanNeeded (unregistered)
Amazing, what else is new? Televisions sets also blast you with radiation, as well as the radio waves that constantly bombard our bodies due to things happening out in space. They just need to stop beating around the bush with these things, I don't want to hear it's cancer causing today, start a worldwide pandemic then 4 years later they retract their statements because their findings proved that it's not really carcinogenic it requires other factors like you standing next to a high powered microwave with it's shielded door broken, while standing on a roof next to a radio tower while watching the worlds largest CRT television...Scientists are always saying things, then coming back to disprove their own claims. Talk about self contradiction...man such a funny creature.
4. Sniggly (Posts: 6190; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)
WHO has been incredibly disingenuous with this announcement. Even without any hard evidence at all regarding the potential cancer risks involved with cell phones, they're going to go right ahead and make the announcement. I'm all for science and playing it safe, but sometimes you can be so cautious that your actions become irresponsible.
iPhone users have less to worry about, because all they have to do is hold their phone the right way and it won't blast them with radiation at all. Oh yes, I went there. Now where's Taco? :)
7. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 5166; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)
Do you guys remember Johnny Cochrane? he died from a brain tumor. they say it was his cell phone. If this is true, I don't use my cell phone much always talk on the speaker instead of keeping it close to my head.
12. JackFace (Posts: 190; Member since: 03 Nov 2009)
You one of THOSE guys who puts it on speaker and holds it somewhat close to the face? When you speak into it, you move it to your mouth, then back to your ear to hear what someone is saying?
8. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 4703; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)
There is a difference in meaning (at least in the English language, that is) between the terms 'possibly' and 'are'.... PA's title (using the word are) implies a definite conclusion that was not reached by the IARC (who used the word possibly).
9. steven252000 (Posts: 64; Member since: 10 Feb 2010)
Guess it is time for the commercials to begin: Have you or a loved one developed a brain tumor as a result of using a cell phone? If so you may be intitled to compensation.....Contact the law offices of............ Any and everything we do these days is bad for ya. One day something causes cancer the next day the talk about possible benefits of the same item.
11. r2212xx (Posts: 41; Member since: 18 Apr 2011)
It's everyday new research. A few months ago it was that mobile phones are extremely hazardous. Just stay away from them. Then they said it's good for you. It prevents Alzheimers and premature memory loss. And now we have this.. I hope they make up their mind for once.
13. remixfa (Posts: 13882; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
a) says nothing new. There isnt ANY conclusive evidence one way or another.
b) if you notice the bodies that say they are are also "world" bodies and bodies of very liberal countries. This is a precurser to a new tax on cell phones. Nothing more. They are going to spend a few more years scaring people into thinking they are unsafe so that way they can pass an exise tax on it like tobacco or other "harmful products".
c) if there was REAL evidence we would be hearing from tons of independant DOCTORS and independant institutions, not from government bodies who's only answers are higher taxes and more control over your personal freedoms.
28. V (unregistered)
My friend, it seems to me that you are as dumb as you are stupid. Then you should read more, learn about SAR value and stuff. You all are trying to believe that the phones are not hurting us, just because you cannot see it. That's the reason... You can get cancer now from almost everything, from the food to the shampoo that you're using. So how to blame the cell phones especially?! Really now... Get a life and be serious. Of course the cell manufacturers are paying a lot of money to their own scientists to claim that the radiation does not harm, but that's a big lie. The radiation kills you slowly, same as cigarrets, alcohol and drugs. If it was an immediate effect, I can ensure you that it would have been dramatical as you would like to hear about.
15. networkdood (Posts: 4748; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)
Hmm, I wonder if we paint the phones using lead-based paints will that lessen the effects of radiation.
19. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 4703; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)
Yeah, painting the phones with lead-based paint might reduce the radiation exposure that possibly is hazardous, but it would increase exposure to a hazard (lead) that definitely is hazardous.... :-)
16. luis_lopez_351 (Posts: 951; Member since: 18 Nov 2010)
This is stupid. Everything can give you cancer, also we all have a little cancer, our cells do not come out perfect every time mitosis is performed.
25. droidnator (Posts: 86; Member since: 10 Mar 2011)
Don't be stupid folks. We all like mobiles, but ignorance is your worst enemy. Cell phones COULD BE carcinogenic, because like any electronic device they emit some radiation. And since that's their main purpose - to connect wirelessly, they emit a lot, but you think that just because we like cell phones they are safe, they are our friends? Maybe they are. Or maybe they are slowly killing us. Noone knows for sure yet, but don't dismiss the notion that they are a potential hazard, because they are. In the 60s cigarettes were also considered good for you. Conclusive evidence of the opposite came decades later!
27. joey18 (Posts: 486; Member since: 20 Jul 2010)
now they have to put something inthe phone to fix the radiation is my opinion
30. hammertong (Posts: 21; Member since: 10 May 2010)
Just another bunch of lab rats looking for a megabux gov't grant.
31. Pol (unregistered)
My small contribution:
Best known as "Cell Phone Exposure May Protect Against and Reverse Alzheimer’s Disease"
So... what’s the deal ?