Verizon starts shipping the Nokia Lumia 822; delivery date is November 15th
Share:
 |
The Nokia Lumia 822 should arrive at your house by Thursday |
Verizon's web site shows the Nokia Lumia 822 shipping by November 13th which is today. Hooray for truth in advertising. The device is $99.99 with a signed two-year pact. The HTC 8X will ship by November 21st according to Big Red's web site, and costs $199.99 on contract. The Nokia Lumia 822 is a Verizon exclusive. It is similar to the Nokia Lumia 820 although the Verizon model offers a larger capacity battery at 1800 mAh vs. 1650, and a 1.2MP front facing camera against the .3MP shooter on the front of the Nokia Lumia 820.
source: WPCentral
Share:
Samsung Galaxy S III mini heads to the states as the Samsung Galaxy Axiom 
Here we go again: Microsoft versus Motorola FRAND patent trial starts 
Related phones
7 Comments
1. TROLL (limited) 5 days ago posted on 13 Nov 2012, 21:44 0
Microsoft is making a big push with WP8, as it tries to take on iOs @ Android, which has dominated the market. The company saw limited success with it's WP7, but hoping for a that more flexible redesign and promotion will boosts its numbers. i dont think so! it never has, had what diffrence will this make?
2. ChiX017 posted on 13 Nov 2012, 22:54 2
Pleasee no one comment on this *except this of course*
7. asseek posted on 14 Nov 2012, 09:03 1
true, the best way is to ignore Troll in every comment he writes
3. freebee269 posted on 13 Nov 2012, 23:10 1
i'm hoping windows phone's make up some ground. as a consumer, the more options i have the better it is for me.
4. Droid_X_Doug posted on 13 Nov 2012, 23:17 0
Ummm. Has nobody noticed the graphic on the home page for this article is what was originally put up for the story about the failed Google Play experience earlier today? Just sayin.
5. Dr.Phil posted on 13 Nov 2012, 23:20 0
I can't see the HTC 8X getting very many sales at a $100 more than the Nokia. I could be wrong, but it just doesn't look appealing.
6. Dr.Phil posted on 13 Nov 2012, 23:54 0
I meant to say the price doesn't look appealing, not the device itself.
