(Posts: 5; Member since: 06 Nov 2010)
AND AT THE END OF THE DAY.... SPRINT IS THE ONLY REAL COMPANY RUNNING A "NEXT GEN NETWORK"....
(HSPA+ IS AN UPGRADE TO THE CURRENT NETWORK SO TMO'S 3G+ DOESNT COUNT AS NEXT GEN)
(Posts: 521; Member since: 26 Dec 2008)
you're full of it jb, I can smell it from here.
no pity (unregistered)
Actually you are incorrect. MetroPCS has already launched 4g LTE in many of its' markets...that is LTE. So the correct statement would include Metro also using a next generation network.
As for your latter statement I agree...it is only an upgrade but that will not stop them from marketing spin to get leverage their way.
LOL!!! jb Sprints "4g" is also just an upgrade and only has 28 markets open (and they have been working on their "4g" the past 2 years).... plus its wimax... download speeds are a little faster but upload are the exact same as CDMA 3g so.. sorry to tell you but sprint fails they are in one way shape or form "running a next gen network"
There are no 4G networks. LTE and WiMAX don't meet the standard for 4G technology...
actually the sad thing is tmo is faster than sprint ! also sprint charges you extra for 4g which they hardly cover usa . pretty sad
personally I think this is Verizons way of saying they are about to have a limited launch
(Posts: 39; Member since: 06 Apr 2010)
Well they gotta keep it interesting now everyone knows that come january all eyes will be on verizon an service wise right now they are still killing everybody regardless of data lack next year yes a big surprise will see verizon showing what they really are made of.
I ant to know why a phone cannot just get a software update to handle 4G or whatever... my home modem handles whatever att sends it... kinda dumb
(Posts: 5387; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)
i don't think so, i think its related to hardware
It is all hardware related. Just like a CDMA phone cant run on a GSM network. Sorry jackbeans, but no OTA to run 4G
VZ Guy (unregistered)
I work for an indirect VZ retailer, we just got an email saying this sign's not supposed to go up until the end of the month. Looks like someone just jumped the gun.
better than you (unregistered)
Sprint's 4g is only covers 60 million. tops at 10megs and doesn't even cover New York City. Verizon and At&t LTE will only cover 80 million by the end of next year and tops out at 12megs. T-mobile will cover 200 million by the end of THIS year and with average of 8 to 10 megs and by the end of next year it will double. Who wins? Who is backed the largest cell phone company in the world? Dueche Telecom = T-mobile. And T-mobile is probably getting the iPhone before x-mas.
you know there is no such thing as 3g or 4g speed. It is the type of network not the speed of the network. So all cell carriers are full of poooy. They got done fighting over the fastest most reliable and largest 3g networks and are beating each other about 4g. It is a marketing scam to get people to buy phones. Personally I could care less about the 3g or 4g network because the speed varies due to the coverage area and also it depends on blockages such as buildings, trees, and wires.
shamar vz and tmo lover (unregistered)
verizon and sprint only have 4g networks not metro pcs because they can only reach speed up to 1mbp which tmo and vz can reach in there 3g networkand its true verizon does have the fastest 4g network in miami the 4g modem can reach speed of 40mbps to 50mbps sprint in miami is only 20-30 tmo wonnabe 4g gets 5 to 10 so vzw is not tellin a lie...
vz is overpriced (unregistered)
Reading through here it seems that the choices for reliable highspeed networks are tmo,vz and sprint. Since the definition for 4g is 100mbs+ NONE of them actually have a true 4g network or even 4g capable network. Independent testing shows sprint and tmo almost neck and neck in download speed, with verizon significantly slower. The biggest difference I have found is that vz's plans are really bad. While the two other carriers offer a decent amount of minutes + unlimites text/web for 79.99 a month vz limps in with NO PLAN FOR UNLIMITED TEXT(wtf?) you can get 5k for $20, then data is required to be bundled at 29.99 for unlimited. So you add this to their cheapest talk plan at 59.99 and for a network that is slower you end up paying about $40 more a month for the same thing you could get with any other carriers, who from every independent study I have seen, are faster than vz. I've gotta ask myself, "why would anyone go with vz?".
@ JB AND Shamar.... I think you need to do your research before posting something falsifying a company such as "Spring." ALL carriers as of right now, are running at HSPA+ or below. HSPA+ is just a "faster" version of 3G. Period. Verizon can only uphold its 4G "promise" to a laptop or PC and I still highly doubt that since they are already making false advertisment for having the "fastest" 4G network on cell phones when they don't even have any that are capable of "4G" speeds released!! Same goes for AT&T and they dont even run on HSPA+ yet they are falsifying their adds aswell. Its pathetic. No cell carrier out there is realistically running on 100+ mbs!! NONE. All run 21 and below!!
As far as pricing goes ..... I suggest everyone go to a website called "billshrink.com" and the proof is in the pudding right there.
Actually.....your totally wrong. Sprint plans to eventually switch to the 4G LTE network. Why? Because its better. :)
i work for HTC corp. and sprint is the fastest at&t and t-mobile is a upgraded 3g and after 2gb on tmoblie your speeds get slower. verizon lte is fast but with how many people are on the network it slows it down other wise verizon would be the fastest but if you dont beleave me check for yours self take a at&t 4g phone a verizon 4g phone a sprint 4g phone and test it. i have lots of times and sprint takes it. and no sprint is not swiching to lte thats why they added the $10 so they can keep building more towers. verizon is they way to go if you do alot of travling and sprint if you want a good price and fast speeds if you go with at&t or tmoible then you really dont know anything