Verizon LTE hits its 500th market completing the initial buildout
0. phoneArena 27 Jun 2013, 11:11 posted on
AT&T may be able to claim the fastest LTE network across the U.S., but Verizon certainly has the most expansive. Today, Verizon announced that it has lit up its LTE network in its 500th market, which completes the initial buildout of the network, and means that Verizon's LTE network covers almost the same area as its CDMA network...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10439; Member since: 14 May 2012)
The new mobile view for PA is actually not that bad. Good job guys.
OT: Verizon has the best coverage, yes, but the prices of their plans are expensive. You get what you pay for and as of now, you're paying for LTE coverage all over the country.
9. roldefol (Posts: 4103; Member since: 28 Jan 2011)
It's worth it IMO. I wouldn't leave Verizon, even if AT&T is faster and has better devices. I respect Verizon for going straight to LTE, building the network as quickly as they did, and focusing on covering as wide an area as possible. I don't love the company, but I have to respect them.
11. icyrock1 (Posts: 307; Member since: 25 Mar 2013)
According to there coverage maps, I should be covered in LTE. Yet the LTE network here is spotty and unreliable.
15. Malique001 (Posts: 58; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)
It states that it covers "almost" the same area as 3G. Remember, as long as you get at least one bar of LTE, you're technically covered. When Verizon refarms its 3G to LTE, you should get greater service from it because every cell tower will transmit a LTE signal.
17. Daftama (Posts: 619; Member since: 03 Nov 2012)
Lets don't straight as much as I hate vzw At&t does not have the fastest 4G LTE they have the fastest 4G according to spectrum wise vzw has the lowest which 700 I believe thus making them the fastest 4LTE, ppl who dont know fall for commercial like largest 4G and first 4G and fastest 4G yet they are not true 4G LTE....
2. XPERIA-KNIGHT (unregistered)
New look? Looks ......good :)
4. Dorothy69 (banned) (Posts: 498; Member since: 21 May 2013)
I HATE it, switched to Desktop View. Don't get me wrong, it's probably great for those who have super slow phones or flashless watered-down web iBrowsers.
3. Dorothy69 (banned) (Posts: 498; Member since: 21 May 2013)
Wow, 500!!!!!!!, and that's just the "initial roll-out"!!
Well, damn, that's why my Verizon SuperSmartphone blazes all over the web.
Verizon = Tramping on the rest!!!
5. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4274; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)
The LTE signal here in my little northern Florida town is pretty weak, but it's still here. Great job Verizon, you're the best
10. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5711; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)
yeah, same here in Spring Hill, TN but just the west side.
6. Omarc07 (Posts: 396; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)
thats great but i wish they improved there lte signal over here in los angeles i stilll have my work phone with them and lte signal in most buildings is pretty weak phone drops down to 3G and i get full bars of 3G i also have my personal phone from att and from what i noticed att maintains lte deep in buiildings.
7. JMartin22 (Posts: 1937; Member since: 30 Apr 2013)
Now that they have LTE done. They have to start all over again and do LTE Advanced.
8. roldefol (Posts: 4103; Member since: 28 Jan 2011)
I would expect the transition from LTE to LTE-Advanced to be much, much easier with the infrastructure currently in place. I don't know enough about the tech, but would it be more of a software update?
12. icyrock1 (Posts: 307; Member since: 25 Mar 2013)
Nope. LTE advanced has a different architecture to delivering the signal to devices than normal LTE. For example, if a LTE network gets congested, normally you'd just have to deal with it. With LTE advanced it decides if a network tower is already congested and switches you to a tower with less people. It also has far better speeds (100mps compared to the 15mps currently offered by their network).
They have to update their towers, phones, and the phones need to support the network (snapdragon 800 chips come with LTE advanced support built in).
13. TechnoTechyes (Posts: 64; Member since: 24 Jan 2011)
That 'children' comment is pointless, Verizon is including children in their 298 Million number. You should remove it. Remove children and they would have to say they cover about 215 million people.
More/Less Verizon is claiming that where 90% of the people live, they have LTE. But they are not claiming anything about where people travel. Right now in the west, people drive in and out of LTE covered areas daily. Their LTE coverage in the west is about half their CDMA coverage.
14. roscuthiii (Posts: 2203; Member since: 18 Jul 2010)
Going by your math then from your own statement, Verizon's CDMA coverage is about 430 million people?! Damn when did we get this many people in the US.
16. milesboy5 (Posts: 178; Member since: 07 Nov 2012)
If I do recall there CDMA coverage in the west was spotty to begin with, but that being said it doesn't explain the lack of LTE in the west.