US Galaxy S III models get CyanogenMod 9, except for Verizon's
Development of CM9 for the US Galaxy S III is still in its early phase, and the ROM itself is said to be not very stable, although good enough for a "daily driver". But what about Verizon GS III users? As you know, Samsung announced a Developer Edition of the Verizon version, which is practically the same but with an unlocked bootloader, but in order to get one of those you'll have to pay full price ($599), as Big Red isn't subsidizing it. Plus, getting one won't even guarantee that you'll eventually get CM 9 for it, as the CyanogenMod team hasn't announced plans of bringing its software to it yet.
But, if you are a proud owner of an AT&T, T-Mobile or Sprint Galaxy S III, feel free to visit this link to learn everything you need to know about installing CM9 on your device.
8. christony1120 (Posts: 65; Member since: 07 Dec 2010)
Verizon is better than all the other phone carriers
3. simplyj (Posts: 404; Member since: 23 Dec 2009)
I have a question: If you wanted LTE on the GSIII you had to switch out the quad core for a dual core.. So why does T-Mobile's variant have a dual core instead of the quad core! Damn you T-Mo
5. dcgore (Posts: 211; Member since: 24 Feb 2012)
I believe the quad core (international version) does not have the 1700 AWS frequency in which Tmo's HPSA+ operates in.
4. shammont (Posts: 30; Member since: 22 Jun 2012)
Verizon sux ... get rid of apple and Verizon and the world would be a better place.
6. AngryApplcpCustomer (Posts: 4; Member since: 05 Jul 2012)
Agreed. Apple and Verizon disgust me.
7. Wildmanfan (Posts: 238; Member since: 15 Jul 2010)
This is just another way that proves my point to these 2 ass holes on this site that kiss Screwizon's ass. f**k You Screwizon.