U.S. Transportation Department may try to regulate your smartphone navigation
0. phoneArena 16 Jun 2014, 19:40 posted on
Right now seems to be a troubling time for technology regulation. There are already threats to net neutrality rumbling in the FCC, and now there is a report that the U.S. Transportation Department may be aiming for stronger regulatory control over mobile navigation systems in cars and on your smartphone...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. wilsong17 (Posts: 828; Member since: 10 Mar 2013)
the question is are the consumer going to sanction this
7. PBXtech (Posts: 970; Member since: 21 Oct 2013)
Average consumer is clueless and spineless.
10. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5615; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)
It is not whether the consumer will sanction the move. It is about whether business will sanction the move. In the U.S. at least, we live in a corporatocracy - where everyone exists to serve the corporation. Consumers exist to consume goods and services provided by corporations until they die, and then their families consume burial/cremation services and the cycle repeats itself.
In a corporatocracy, the consumers are generating massive amounts of data on what they do and where they go. This data is in turn mined by corporations to provide services and products for the consumers to consume. Take away a source of the data (by the proposed regulations), and the corporations start to suffer. Look at the math - 59 minutes, 44 seconds total out of a trip length of say 1 hour x 200 million is a lot of consuming data that is lost and can never be retrieved (and this is but one scenario; there are others that are worse). No ads get served, no products gets considered, no goods or services get consumed.
Restrictions are not going to be implemented. Carbon cap and trade has a better chance of becoming implemented that this scheme. There are too many existential threats to too many corporations in this scheme.
2. 14545 (Posts: 1101; Member since: 22 Nov 2011)
Awesome, we need even more government regulation......... Clearly we aren't over regulated and taxed enough.
4. hurrycanger (Posts: 985; Member since: 01 Dec 2013)
Yup. It's awesome. I love them regulations.
5. buccob (Posts: 1370; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)
This is quite stupid. What about passengers using the navigation system... Is it going to be regulated without reason too?
6. hurrycanger (Posts: 985; Member since: 01 Dec 2013)
They're going to do something like: "To prove you're a passenger, type retype the words as shown. Because the driver won't be able to type all these words while driving."
That's gonna be fun.
8. buccob (Posts: 1370; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)
To be honest, I consider myself a good driver, though I do use my phone while driving, it always stays as second priority behind driving itself... I have never cause an accident because of this and I am aware that not all people have the same ability to "multitask"...... but I use Navigation systems quite often and I DO look at the map from time to time besides voice guidance... it takes the same fraction of a second just as you would do by looking at the mirrors... and my Country, specifically my City is one of the hardest cities to drive in, almost completely anarchic when it comes to traffic, with little to no respect of sings, lights, lanes, pedestrians, etc... large numbers of potholes, motorcyclist driving between lanes and so on..... having learned that way I consider myself to have develop great reflexes, skills and ability to operate the phone without getting distracted by it... as opposed to countries where the law is actually respected and need not these "skills".
Anyway I am not debating the whole "right/wrong" thing around this, I am just disappointed that everybody gets punished internationally because of the U.S.T.D.
And at the end I think this is going to cause more accidents with people trying to bypass whatever regulations get approved.
I.E. people driving will try to type the requested word to "prove" they are passengers...
I do like how Waze politely remind you that you shouldn't type unless you are a passenger..
11. andynaija (Posts: 455; Member since: 08 Sep 2012)
Totally agree, I'm the same way as well, I just don't put my full focus on navigation most of the time I just drive until I hear about a turn or instruction then I look at the map.
What country are you from by the way?
12. hurrycanger (Posts: 985; Member since: 01 Dec 2013)
I look at my phone once in a while in the car, too. Most of the time the screen is off, but sometimes I wanna check where I'm gonna turn next or how long or whatever it is. It doesn't take long, just a sec for whatever information I need at a time.
"I.E. people driving will try to type the requested word to "prove" they are passengers..."
yup, you just completed my whole idea. It's the same thing you said, this is going to cause more accidents with people trying to bypass stuff.
9. techloverNYC (Posts: 392; Member since: 20 Nov 2012)
This is literally and exactly the samething they did to those on car GPS. You guys know those GPS that don't allow you to navigate when you are moving (while in motion) to avoid distraction. This makes those on GPS useless now for many. I know some car service drivers bought their own separate GPS now, just because you can use it anytime without stopping first.
13. AfterShock (Posts: 2731; Member since: 02 Nov 2012)
I've a mounted tablet in my work truck, it handles my dispatched calls an GPS to where people are in need of help.
I am allowed by law to use it while driving, though it makes me feel guilty to do so, usually I won't until stopped, my phone is off limits. Professional driver or not, I do not let myself be distracted.
Though each day, I have to honk at least two times at people drifting into my lane or not going on green lights.
Is frustrating, people are only filling themselves that they can do both,well.