Tri-band LTE version of Samsung Galaxy S4 visits FCC enroute to Sprint
0. phoneArena 22 Oct 2013, 11:43 posted on
Now that money is flowing freely once again through the nation's capitol, the FCC is open for business which means that these lucky guys go back to their job testing out new featurephones, smartphones and tablets, among other things; on Tuesday, we noticed that the Samsung SPH-L720T handset had just come back from visiting with the Feds...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. Jocelyn84 (Posts: 6; Member since: 10 Dec 2012)
S4GRU posted this story yesterday -s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-356-teaser-samsung-galaxy-s4-2-3/
3. a_merryman (Posts: 546; Member since: 14 Dec 2011)
It is probably where they got the story from and just didn't want to credit them.
7. Alan01 (Posts: 151; Member since: 21 Mar 2012)
FYI, the story was taken straight from the FCC site. we ALWAYS cite other sources when we use them.
2. silencer271 (Posts: 145; Member since: 05 Apr 2013)
should automatically switch out everyones gs4 for this.
4. speed4evr (Posts: 78; Member since: 05 Oct 2011)
It's smart of sprint to release tri-band devices before they fully launch BC41 LTE...future proof devices. I feel bad for some of the people who got the dual band S4.
5. Jocelyn84 (Posts: 6; Member since: 10 Dec 2012)
First, who cares about 41, I'm much more interested in building penetrating 26 LTE 800. Also, not sure why you said Dual band, as the current S4 (SPH-L720), and the Note 3 (900P) for that matter, both only support uniband LTE (band 25 LTE 1900).
6. a_merryman (Posts: 546; Member since: 14 Dec 2011)
Band 41 is important for the capacity it has. It will take a long time to slow down LTE on that band thanks to how much spectrum Sprint has in it. But yeah, I'm looking forward to the building penetration 800 is going to bring.
14. lsutigers (Posts: 670; Member since: 08 Mar 2009)
As a_merryman mentioned Band 41 represents a huge capacity and speed upgrade for Sprint users. Clearwire achieved100+mbps on 20x20 channels.
8. emcdonald75 (Posts: 10; Member since: 07 Nov 2012)
I wish they would release a Tri-Band HTC One. I love that phone!!!
10. Chris_Bakke (Posts: 172; Member since: 23 Jan 2013)
As an original adopter of the first GS4, what advantages would getting a tri-band version bring?
11. Jocelyn84 (Posts: 6; Member since: 10 Dec 2012)
LTE that isn't slow (severely congested) lol, assuming you live in a market that supports the other two bands. Quite a few markets do now, check out S4GRU :)
12. Augustine (Posts: 433; Member since: 28 Sep 2013)
Those bands, 850, 1900 and 2500MHz, are used in only 5% of the countries in the world. As a matter of fact, it would fail to roam in the AT&T, T-mobile and Verizon networks. Rather, were this device capable of the three bands used in the US, 700, 1700 and 1900MHz, it could work in 1/3 of the countries in the world. Or, better yet, also with the pervasive 1800 and 2600MHz bands, it could work in almost 90% of countries.
13. lsutigers (Posts: 670; Member since: 08 Mar 2009)
Not exactly. China Mobile with close to a billion customers is working on 2500 TD-LTE, not to mention, Qualcomm has managed to pack a ton of LTE band support in their latest SOC's. This is indeed a huge plus for Sprint users in the US and traveling abroad.
15. a_merryman (Posts: 546; Member since: 14 Dec 2011)
Dont forget about the new owners of Sprint, Softbank, using it in Japan as well. I'm fairly certain a number of other countries are planning on using it too, especially since China Mobile is doing it...not even counting the major markets of the USA and Japan, that is a major win for 2500 TD-LTE proliferation.
Sprint is the only one to use 800 though, dont know about 1900, AT&T is apparently testing out LTE in PCS....no clue what band or frequency
16. Augustine (Posts: 433; Member since: 28 Sep 2013)
Who cares about a particular operator in China or in Japan for a phone sold in the US? There are many LTE bands and it's unfeasible to support all of them, but It's important to provide those that will avoid being in the dark when traveling abroad. And by this one would obviously consider that it's more important to have a phone compatible with some operators in a most countries than with all operators in a given country.
Then again, this phone is not even a world phone with measly dual bands for GSM and UMTS...