x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Options
    Close




Thousand points of light: the brightest mobile display to date on the Nokia 701 compared

0. phoneArena 01 Oct 2011, 11:46 posted on

We examined the 1000 nits display on the Nokia 701 via an improvised outdoor setup with the Apple iPhone 4 and the Samsung Galaxy S II, and put increased brightness on our wishlist for the next generation of mobile displays...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 01 Oct 2011, 11:58 3

1. som (Posts: 768; Member since: 10 Nov 2009)


Samsung releases 1.5GHz Exynos dual-core processor and 16MP CMOS camera for mobiles. Nokia may be need this to supporting the screen brightness.

posted on 01 Oct 2011, 12:01 10

2. Muhannad (Posts: 455; Member since: 20 Sep 2011)


I don't understand, are you trying to compare some high end smartphone from Samsung to a mid range smartphone by Nokia?

posted on 01 Oct 2011, 13:45 4

8. Yeeee (Posts: 190; Member since: 02 Aug 2011)


I would still take the galaxy s 2 and iphone over that anyday.

posted on 20 Apr 2012, 13:55

31. epdm2be (Posts: 149; Member since: 20 Apr 2012)


Yeeee: again you don't seem to get the point.

The Nokia 701 is a cheap (about 250 euro) device compared to a 500 euro (and more) phones.

This week with the FREE OS upgrade that device got even MORE value for money with it's free 1.3GHz performance increase which is NOT bad and a hugely improved Nokia Belle FP1 OS (we don't call it Symbian no-more)

The 701 is undeniably a bargain. And ppl are stupid not to get one, just for the fun of it.

posted on 01 Oct 2011, 15:47 1

14. vivek.ray (Posts: 22; Member since: 08 Apr 2011)


CMOS sensors seriously !!! now get this straight u need some good lenses first, to produce 16 MP of pic quality to be used on that sensor . Now Google the company having best smartphone camera in any segment .

posted on 01 Oct 2011, 12:31 7

3. SupercoolDan (unregistered)


I'll bet that much less expensive Nokia beats that very expensive Samsung in battery life too. I just saw an article by someone who said he was sorry he bought a Samsung and wished for the Nokia now. Sometimes it's very expensive to learn.

posted on 01 Oct 2011, 13:03 4

5. NotsoCoolDAN (unregistered)


who the F would want a pos Nokia over the GS2?

posted on 01 Oct 2011, 13:28 9

7. molbal (unregistered)


I would.

posted on 01 Oct 2011, 14:25 4

11. dacastrator (Posts: 232; Member since: 22 Sep 2011)


Doesnt mean that GS2 has better specs than a cheap Nokia also means that its better in every aspect. I'll bet my a$$ that my 6 year old Nokia 5810 has 3 times the battery life of your GS2.

posted on 01 Oct 2011, 19:17 2

15. RORYREVOLUTION (Posts: 2927; Member since: 12 Jan 2010)


your phone has better battery life, okay

now lets show what the GS2 has better.

Bigger wider screen, much faster processor, better camera, way better web browser, better music player, better app store, better features, thinner, better looking, etc etc etc

So yes you enjoy your battery life that probably only lasts an hour more at most and i'll enjoy everything else.

posted on 02 Oct 2011, 22:04 1

25. ledbetterp3 (Posts: 466; Member since: 31 Aug 2011)


I would much rather have nokia hardware, but because the fact i am an android fan, i would pick the gs2 over any nokia anyday, but other than that, since there other choices rather than crappy samsung, i would pick anything else...

posted on 20 Apr 2012, 15:17

32. epdm2be (Posts: 149; Member since: 20 Apr 2012)


I would. And I bought one.

You should too. It's a bargain at 250 euro. You get a phone with a great screen (as illustrated above). Full bluetooth transfer and syncing, Fm-radio AND transmitter, 7GB internal storage+SD-card expansion, it's the only smartphone with full 2-way call recording, can be used as a BT/USB-thumbdrive or USB-modem. And Nokia Maps & Drive is fantastic. It integrates seamless with the Nokia adressbook and calender. And it can be synced over USB (I know it's trivial but many newer phones can't) without the need for expensive data-plans and clouds.

Like I said. It's a bargain and everyone should get a 701, even just for the sake of it.

posted on 01 Oct 2011, 12:41 4

4. vette21man (Posts: 351; Member since: 06 Apr 2011)


Maybe a brighter and brighter display is not necessarily the way of the future. But somehow using ambient light to increase screen visibility will take over. I know some company tried to do that, but I guess it never took off. We'll need some screen cover by 3M that re-directs ambient light into the backlight. Put your thinking caps on people!

posted on 02 Oct 2011, 16:55

24. NeXoS (Posts: 278; Member since: 03 May 2011)


Transparent displays where you hold your phone against the sun and the sun becomes your back light. How many nits is the sun?

posted on 01 Oct 2011, 13:14 2

6. Medalaster01 (unregistered)


May be iphone5 could have better ppi.

posted on 01 Oct 2011, 14:10 6

9. dacastrator (Posts: 232; Member since: 22 Sep 2011)


Stop day dreaming dude, wipe your saliva. Seriously why do iFags tend to day dream about the iPhone getting better specs when they see another phone with greater specs. Probably because you already know that you iPhone is inferior. Get over it.

posted on 01 Oct 2011, 20:02

16. Nickmfnjackson (Posts: 101; Member since: 21 Jan 2010)


No need to be hateful. I love android as much as anyone and I belive android to be better but that's just my personal opinion. Just like ifans love iphones, its okay, we can coexist

posted on 01 Oct 2011, 14:15 4

10. CellularNinja (Posts: 299; Member since: 27 Sep 2011)


i care more about resolution and battery life

posted on 01 Oct 2011, 21:39

18. HTCiscool (Posts: 449; Member since: 16 Jul 2011)


That makes one of us. Is rather have a legible display in sunlight than one of high res
(over 300 ppi). But yore right on battery life.

posted on 02 Oct 2011, 04:48 1

19. XiphiasGladius (Posts: 801; Member since: 21 Aug 2011)


Me to, although brightness is next in line from the two you mentioned. I seldom view videos and photos in direct sunlight, so at present I still dont need that much brightness. . .

posted on 20 Apr 2012, 15:21

33. epdm2be (Posts: 149; Member since: 20 Apr 2012)


Yes you do. Because when you TAKE that picture it's usually in daytime preferably well-lit scenes. Since well-lit environments are best on these phone-camera's as is prooven on every review regardless of the phone-brand or -preference.

posted on 01 Oct 2011, 14:27 1

12. henk-jan (unregistered)


I want a phone that doesn't give light by darkness, but you can still see whats on your screen, you know what i mean?

posted on 01 Oct 2011, 14:51

13. dacastrator (Posts: 232; Member since: 22 Sep 2011)


No. Retard.

posted on 01 Oct 2011, 21:35 3

17. HTCiscool (Posts: 449; Member since: 16 Jul 2011)


Sinse I got my HTCs and gave up the Amoled screen on my Nokia C7 I was quite shocked on how terrible the super LCDs were in comparism. You can't deny that while Nokia may have issues in other areas of their phones they make the best screens of them all. Best screen I've ever used on phone came from Nokia E7.

posted on 02 Oct 2011, 07:00 1

20. Striker (unregistered)


Hahahaha! Nokia has just made Samsung look pathetic! With much cheaper phone, that has better display, better looks, better camera and better battery! And by the way iPhone 4, which is much older, comapred to that yellow s**t from Asia, still has the better display. Koreans are ridiculous...

posted on 02 Oct 2011, 07:06 1

21. bbblader (unregistered)


SGS2 - faster proccesor - needed for android
15 hrs standby battery life - because of android
Bigger wider screen - cant fit in my hand and even portrait qwerty is hard with only 1 hand
better camera - wow 1080p = 1 sec = 10 MB(yup better[sarcasm])
way better web browser - android browser sucks more than even symbian anna
better music player - kinda good actually but i like belle's better
better app store - good apps which give you less than 15 hrs of battery life
better features - oh 1 home screen more and too complicated
thinner - big and thin = s**t
better looking - same design on every other galaxy and the design on 701 is the same like 2 other devices
etc etc etc - you ran out of ideas? too bad
and i bet that ijoke 5 is going to be even more breakable

posted on 20 Apr 2012, 15:46

34. epdm2be (Posts: 149; Member since: 20 Apr 2012)


bbblader: I think the iPhoney 5 will be more familiar with the 1st generation model. A fully metal body and glass at the front. In 2012 they call that 'unibody-design' I think ;-)

posted on 02 Oct 2011, 14:02

22. asahi (unregistered)


both nokia 701 & iphone 4 has 3.5in screen.

then why it looks the iphone screen is bigger than that of 701? it must be the same, right?

did you guys notice that?

posted on 02 Oct 2011, 22:38

26. kulas (unregistered)


it is because of the display orientation 16:9 for the 701 and 4:5 for the IP4

posted on 02 Oct 2011, 16:30

23. drmobile (unregistered)


Idon,t know why this site against gsm arena don,t like sony ericsson phones.the best screen i have seen are from ray and arc specialy ray.with high density and reality display with bravia.every thing in xperia ray and arc are very real and cool bright in very beautiful design.

posted on 03 Oct 2011, 06:57

28. rai999 (unregistered)


A bright display is not enough. Nokia always hangs.Nokia has no faster processor and Wide display But samsung has both .A less powerfull machine consumes less power.Thats why Nokia phones has a little bit long battery life.This is not enough.

posted on 20 Apr 2012, 15:57

35. epdm2be (Posts: 149; Member since: 20 Apr 2012)


what do you mean with "Nokia always hangs"?

As for the faster processor. Are you blind? The S^3 models ALL had faster processors. In fact the Nokia 701 (the model where the article is all about) has a 1GHz processor when at its release, This has been upgraded FREELY to 1.3GHz with the last Belle FP1 upgrade. Which is on par with similar and even higher priced models with WP7 and Android. E.g. The LG Optimus Black is MORE expensive and also has a 1GHz single core-cpu (I don't see you complain about that) or the HTC Radar (wp7) or even Nokia's own Lumia 800 with it's 1,4Ghz single core cpu is less value for money compared to this 701 with 1,3Ghz cpu.

Which other did this. And in the near future it could be t

posted on 03 Oct 2011, 07:14

29. rai999 (unregistered)


Nokia cheated indian people over the years.Now people know wht is better.If u compare in this picture u find that i phone s display is wider than 701.
If u compare with HTC Nokia is nothing infront of HTC.

posted on 23 Oct 2011, 23:13

30. ataur (Posts: 3; Member since: 22 Oct 2011)


if n701 had a 12mp auto focus camera with xenon flash as like as n8!

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories