The NSA can listen to your calls without a warrant
0. phoneArena 16 Jun 2013, 20:09 posted on
Before Congress could make comments against the NSA, the agency told lawmakers in a secret meeting that interpretation of federal surveillance law allows the NSA to listen to domestic and international callsl; we're not just talking about metadata here, but both sides of a full conversation. This most likely includes your texts and emails...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. darkkjedii (Posts: 20045; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)
I'll give them something to listen to. Nosey jerks!!!
2. InspectorGadget80 (unregistered)
NSA ARE A BUNCH OF D!CKS
3. quesoesgrande (Posts: 217; Member since: 03 Aug 2011)
This has gotten out of hand. The NSA shouldnt have this kind of power. This is nuts. I really hope next term we can get some real leadership in the White House; Republican, Democrat, or indifferent.
11. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)
"I really hope next term we can get some real leadership in the White House; Republican, Democrat, or indifferent."
4. Dorothy69 (banned) (Posts: 498; Member since: 21 May 2013)
Dear Mr O-BamBam:
I hope you aren't monitoring what I write herein but if you are, please know, I could give a ratz @ss. Furthermore, I really wish you would do something about those elephant ears. It's very embarrassing when asked by every foreigner I meet if I've ever flown on Obama Air; I always have to respond by explaining that the ears, unfortunately, also need jet propulsion to cross the Atlantic. Anyway, thank you for Nationwide Health Coverage and all the other federally funded social programs that you continue to impose on the U.S. taxpayer. And, by the way, loved you in Independence Day!!
8. Zero0 (Posts: 592; Member since: 05 Jul 2012)
Because socialized health care is the biggest travesty.
The US is basically the only civilized country without it. Hell, the American taxpayer funds government healthcare in Iraq, but not in its own country!
It's no wonder that the US has the least efficient medical system in the world. All that government intervention and whatnot.
15. rallyguy (Posts: 620; Member since: 13 Mar 2012)
Because socialized medicine sucks. Experience both then you will see. Least efficient? Anytime the government gets involved in anything is when it becomes inefficient. It's still the best, but going down hill fast.
17. Dorothy69 (banned) (Posts: 498; Member since: 21 May 2013)
Just look at every other U.S. public agency or office (Federal or State) that are ALL swimming in inefficiency:
1. Social Security Administration / Medicare - TRAGIC
2. U.S. Postal Service - PATHETIC
3. U.S. Passport Office - ABYSMAL (unless you come across someone who knows what they are doing)
4. Department of Motor Vehicles (State) - I'm sure there are DMV's with competent employees somewhere but in New York DMV workers are just as bad as postal workers.
Just to name a few!! Health Care (Social or otherwise, under Federal guidance) will be what tips this country into mediocrity.
Bottom line: if you're dealing with civil employees (Federal or State or City), you may as speak the universal Section 8 language.
18. Zero0 (Posts: 592; Member since: 05 Jul 2012)
cator/SH.XPD.TOTL.ZS?order=wba pi_data_value_2011+wbapi_data_ value+wbapi_data_value-last&sort=desc
We spend a lot of our money on healthcare, despite being among the most wealthy nations.
Yet we're number 33 in life expectancy.
Go figure. Countries who have less money and spend a smaller percentage of it on healthcare actually have better healthcare systems. They probably have free market systems, except for, I don't know, basically all of them.
6. InternetToughGuy (Posts: 1; Member since: 16 Jun 2013)
Story debunked by ZDNet (no link, since I am new, but search under new headline "Congressman denies report claiming NSA can listen to calls without warrants"):
Update at 2:50 p.m. ET on June 16: We're pulling the plug on this story, following Rep. Nadler's comments that debunk CNET's story. In a statement to our sister site, Nadler said: "I am pleased that the administration has reiterated that, as I have always believed, the NSA cannot listen to the content of Americans’ phone calls without a specific warrant." We've left the amended article (post the previous update, below) in tact for transparency, but corrected the headline.
12. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)
"the administration has reiterated that, as I have always believed, the NSA cannot listen to the content of Americans’ phone calls without a specific warrant."
This is a distinction without a difference. The warrant part is just the fig leaf that makes everything legal. How do you think the phone calls are listened to the moment a judge has signed the warrant?
19. newuser1 (Posts: 226; Member since: 10 Dec 2010)
they can do anything to you without warrant.
16. rallyguy (Posts: 620; Member since: 13 Mar 2012)
Oh wow, the government denies doing it. Well that makes me feel better. Because the government doesn't lie. (extreme sarcasm)