Teacher destroys student's cell phone
11. chark (unregistered) posted on 28 Sep 2010, 23:43 0 0
=QH99uVVucNgIT'S JUST Ad
2. jskrenes posted on 28 Sep 2010, 22:18 0 0
I love how she just went back to to teaching without missing a beat.
4. STC posted on 28 Sep 2010, 22:50 0 0
now and she's not even going to have to pay for that??
6. LOL@YOU (unregistered) posted on 28 Sep 2010, 23:02 0 0
Why would she have to pay for that. It's pretty much an international rule, you don't answer your phone in class. She did the best(and funniest) thing she could have done besides just taking the phone away of course.
24. remixfa posted on 29 Sep 2010, 09:02 0 0
bull. that is destruction of personal property and she should have to replace it. he shouldnt have taken the call, but she has no right to destroy personal property. take the phone away, send him to the dean.. do not break the device out of anger.
27. WOW89 (unregistered) posted on 29 Sep 2010, 16:58 0 0
I agree, though it was funny.
5. chupum posted on 28 Sep 2010, 23:01 0 0
AWESOME! That punk kid deserved to learn some manners. I'll tell you one thing, he's never going to answer his phone in class without having the possibility of his phone being smashed! HAHA
7. ras (unregistered) posted on 28 Sep 2010, 23:08 0 0
bt she cud take tht childs phn away frm him thts nt way by smashing da phn on da ground!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
8. gambino37 posted on 28 Sep 2010, 23:19 0 0
Rude? It's people like hmcougar and ras that further spread the disrespect that kids have these days. What was rude was the moron student talking on a cellphone in class. Which brings me to my next point. Apparently ras is also one of those students who would rather talk/text in class rather than learn how to spell properly. This is a forum, not a text message to your eleven year old bff. It makes you look stupid.
12. chark (unregistered) posted on 28 Sep 2010, 23:45 0 0
10. chark (unregistered) posted on 28 Sep 2010, 23:42 0 0
IT"S JUST Ad http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
13. ap (unregistered) posted on 28 Sep 2010, 23:48 0 0
lol this was funny!!! beep...beep...beep....hello...yeah....boom!! smash!!!!!
14. goodmodo (unregistered) posted on 28 Sep 2010, 23:51 0 0
this is just a online marketing from burger king thailand .
15. Saji (unregistered) posted on 29 Sep 2010, 00:53 0 0
Hahahaha,she deserves a medal!! And anyone who thinks she was wrong probably has the same values as the dipshit kid.
16. cadetz (unregistered) posted on 29 Sep 2010, 01:32 0 0
okay, phone rings, i'm okay with that but answering the phone is the rude part just silence it or walk out to answer the call NOT in the friggin classroom
18. hornetmx posted on 29 Sep 2010, 02:18 0 0
Good thing she is not in the US. Otherwise she would probably be in jail being accused of child abuse and getting sued by the parents due to the mental anguish it caused their kid. He wasnt able to sleep for a week. Poor little kid, it was an emergency call. My 3rd grade teacher used to pull us by the hair if she caughts us talking while she was lecturing. Guess what happen after that?? we stopped.
19. Stoli89 posted on 29 Sep 2010, 03:49 0 0
Great material for a protective case commercial (e.g.): "OtterBox Defender"...don't let this happen to you!
20. ajac09 posted on 29 Sep 2010, 06:13 0 0
yeah that was a commercial or something for sure lame
21. artz1986 posted on 29 Sep 2010, 06:24 0 0
Uhm...you guys don't remember this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
23. X!!!!!!!!! (unregistered) posted on 29 Sep 2010, 08:41 0 0
Xaxaxa,funny,but Imagen you have best phone and your teacher break it.J would break her head.!!!!!
25. XxVerbalxX (unregistered) posted on 29 Sep 2010, 10:02 0 0
ad or not i wish this did happen. cell phones are not allowed in the class room, use at own risk. kids used to get hit and u pussies are bitching about her breaking a cell phone? should of broke it over the twerps head. turn it off or leave it in a locker. if you cant do that you dont deserve to have a cell phone.
26. ccb4life posted on 29 Sep 2010, 14:11 0 0
The problem with this is that the parent probably owns the phone and the teacher just cost the parent $500-$600. She should have took the phone, gave the kid an "F" for the week and had the parent come in to get the phone.
28. longtimeteacher (unregistered) posted on 05 Feb 2011, 00:52 0 0
I don't think that the teacher was angry at all--she was just enforcing the no-cell-phone policy effectively. We give referrals, which earn the kids a five-day vacay from school. I'd much rather just drop the phone in a locked bin for disposal later--and if the policy were published, hey, fair warning!