TSMC reportedly turns down Apple and Qualcomm's $1 bln bids for exclusive chip foundry capacity
0. phoneArena 30 Aug 2012, 04:37 posted on
TSMC is apparently afraid that if it dedicates a factory or two to one single client, it will have a hard time retooling it if a rapid shift in technology appears. We don't know what rapid shift will go against industry stalwarts like Apple and Qualcomm, but you never know what ARM is cooking up its sleeve for the next generation of mobile chipsets, so the Taiwanese are hedging their bets...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. andro. (Posts: 1998; Member since: 16 Sep 2011)
They know for certainty that making a deal with apple will not only lose them their flexibility but would make them literally chained by the groin to the floor by domineering Apple. It makes good sense for them in the long run
3. ph00ny (Posts: 1231; Member since: 26 May 2011)
Not to mention lowball prices apple demands. There were quite a few reports that Apple tends to ask for prices for higher quantity and ends up ordering at a lower quantity which would have warranted a much higher cost per unit from the supplier
4. ph00ny (Posts: 1231; Member since: 26 May 2011)
Morris Chang is a force in foundry business
5. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
Its an example of Apple's over litigious ass coming back to bite them. Who wants to get in bed with a company that demands that you make next to no profit on your product so they can make double profits.. and then threaten you with lawsuits at every corner for the trouble. Heck no.
It shows people are no longer jumping at the opportunity to be part of the Apple supply chain. You cant abuse your suppliers and expect the industry to not notice.
11. gallitoking (Posts: 4718; Member since: 17 May 2011)
a lawsuit that they won.. and it show that it was Samsung that did wrong. so what again??
13. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
yea, thats one lawsuit out of dozens they have filed. They dont have a great winning record actually, but they win enough and throw enough lawyers on the field to keep others nervous.
And besides, This "win" will be over turned on appeal at least partially if not fully. Be careful what you wish for because if any of samsung's patents are found to be infringed upon by the iphone, your looking at a US ban of iphones unless Apple comes to reasonable terms.... which we all know is unlikely.
7. sithvenger (banned) (Posts: 371; Member since: 25 Aug 2012)
Why is no one talkin about Qualcomm n these posts? Aren't they involved too?
8. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
because they dont have a reputation of bullying, patent trolling, we can copy but you cant mentality, ect.
9. ph00ny (Posts: 1231; Member since: 26 May 2011)
I think qualcomm was reportedly signing with Samsung on top of their existing relationship with TSMC to meet demands. I guess that means samsung supplies their own qualcomm SoCs and possibly replace apple for the capacity
10. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
Qualcomm uses 28nm wafers, Samsung uses 32nm wafers and a completely separate high gate tech to make them.
If Q was in talks with samsung to increase production, then they were probably looking for something similar.. a dedicated factory just for qualcomm.
14. ph00ny (Posts: 1231; Member since: 26 May 2011)
Let me know when you're done reading ;)
BTW 32nm HKMG is a more advanced manufacturing method than 28nm polysi which is being used to build the snapdragons
12. jmoita2 (Posts: 930; Member since: 23 Dec 2011)
It's good to see at least some companies not bending over backwards to become Apple's slave.