T-Mobile's Samsung GALAXY Note II will support LTE when the carrier is ready
0. phoneArena 25 Oct 2012, 20:20 posted on
T-Mobile's version of the Samsung GALAXY Note II is actually ready for LTE before the carrier is; inside the phablet, the antennas and radio can pick up LTE signals, but are not activated by default due to the carrier's lack of an LTE pipeline...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. ajac09 (Posts: 1367; Member since: 30 Sep 2009)
+1 for tmobile sprint should have made all there handsets wimax/lte
19. ajac09 (Posts: 1367; Member since: 30 Sep 2009)
I think everyone knows that. Thanks for adding 0 to the topic. Did you need to put in the obvious oh I think sprint should ask the manufactures to put in wimax/lte since your primitive brain cant see beyond that is typed?
9. PapaSmurf (Posts: 8922; Member since: 14 May 2012)
WiMAX was a total fail. Deployment in less than 80 cities and not being able to catch a signal is dreadful.
2. PAPINYC (banned) (Posts: 2315; Member since: 30 Jul 2011)
Well, to T-Mo's credit, they already have 4G in New York City, albeit not LTE, unlike Sprint. My brother just got the T-Mobile Note II today full retail.
Congrats' to all Note II buyers.
5. richardyarrell2011 (banned) (Posts: 510; Member since: 16 Mar 2011)
The Samsung Galaxy Note 2 is the perfect purchase. I am a current Galaxy S3 owner and will be buying the upcoming Galaxy Note 2 on Tmobile November 1st. I will be selling my Galaxy S3 on Wednesday October 31st it was a wonderful device. Nothing will be better than the Galaxy Note 2 within the next 180 days perio. I applaud Tmobile for thinking of it's future with the LTE ADVANCED 10 NETWORK which will be back hauled to it's current HSPA PLUS 42MPS network. It's all about the Galaxy Note 2 now....
10. PapaSmurf (Posts: 8922; Member since: 14 May 2012)
YES! LTE + 42mbps back haul makes me excited. :)
12. nak1017 (Posts: 328; Member since: 08 Jan 2010)
Ironically, with the lightest user load of the 4 major carriers, you'll probably never need the HSPA+ when the LTE is up and running
6. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5954; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)
Ummm. There is an error in either the PA article or the T-Mo quote - PA article claims T-Mo coverage will be 300 million; quote says 200 million. I think 200 million is the correct number. 300 million coverage would be close to 90% of U.S. population....
8. g2a5b0e (Posts: 2725; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)
It is 200 million, however, 300 million would be well over 90% of the U.S. population. The Census Bureau currently has it pegged at around 315 million people.
7. g2a5b0e (Posts: 2725; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)
Yet another reason to pick up the world's current best smartphone.
11. skymitch89 (Posts: 1121; Member since: 05 Nov 2010)
Funny thing about this is that I went and checked out the T-Mo version of the Note 2 yesterday and talked to the guy about it being "future proof" and he said that it will only ever work on the HSPA+ network. I should load this up on my phone and go show him.
This also has me considering going back to T-Mo to get the Note 2 considering that Sprint doesn't have any plans to bring LTE to my area anytime soon.
13. commonforte (Posts: 2; Member since: 27 Oct 2012)
does this mean the T-Mobile model can be unlocked and put other carriers LTE networks like AT&T or Verizon today????
14. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5954; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)
Likely different LTE frequencies between T-Mo and other carriers. If T-Mo is using the same LTE frequency as another carrier (such as AT&T), you would need for T-Mo to give you the unlock code(s) and you would need for the other carrier to agree to let you use your unlocked phone on their network (at least that would be the restriction in the U.S.). CDMA phones are even harder to get to inter-operate than GSM phones (going from T-Mo to VZW is basically a non-starter for that reason).
15. commonforte (Posts: 2; Member since: 27 Oct 2012)
Damn verizon is killing me with this release date.
16. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5954; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)
Yeah. Long enough that they get to tempt people with their other offerings (Droid RAZR HD for example). Soon enough (just barely) that those who have their mind made up don't move to another carrier out of frustration.
17. benzb (Posts: 30; Member since: 19 Jan 2012)
I am trying to decide if I should get the Note 2 with Sprint or T-Mobile. I am in Los Angeles and I have tried out both providers in the past two weeks. T-Mobile HSPA+ download speeds are anywhere between 200kbps all the way to 25mbps depending on the time of day and where I am at in Los Angeles. I usually average about 12mbps down though on T-Mo. Sprint 3G is horrible - the faster I have gotten is 1.3mbps and I usually get less than 300kbps. In the rare instances that I picked up LTE, the maximum I got was 23mbps down and usually sit around 8mbps - 12mbps down. (With very little or any customers on the LTE network.) Having trouble deciding which route to take with a week into my trial. Kind of thinking about T-Mobile because of the superior GSM technology (vs. CDMA) and faster overall speeds. However, I have heard that when leaving the city with T-Mobile, it is basically edge with is even slower than Sprints ridiculous 3G speeds. Any customers on either network that can give me recommendations?
18. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5954; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)
AT&T is 2 weeks away from having the Note II. That might be a better solution that balances availability with data speed and coverage. Of course, VZW is supposed to have the Note II end of November. Decisions, decisions....
20. cjjohnson86 (Posts: 29; Member since: 05 Jan 2012)
For now i like HSPA+. I'm having a better experience than i did with Verizons LTE. Most likely due to there lte network being boggled down from new subscribers and old transitioning ones. Regardless though, considering how many people are on tmo's network, I'd say HSPA+ is more stable. Hell I would be happy if they just kept HSPA+ and worked on upping there coverage on the west coast.