x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Home
  • News
  • T-Mobile to kill Even More Plus plans, bringing “Value” and “Classic”?

T-Mobile to kill Even More Plus plans, bringing “Value” and “Classic”?

Posted: , by Victor H.

Tags:

T-Mobile to kill Even More Plus plans, bringing “Value” and “Classic”?
T-Mobile's Even More Plus plans have quietly disappeared from T-Mo's website back in November last year, and that was the first time one could know that a change was on its way. And now, it's closer than ever as TmoNews got some inside information about the “Value” and “Classic” plans coming to replace Even More Plus. Customers on current plans however won't be affected by the change and can continue using their existing plan.

Simply put, the “Value” option is to be very similar to Even More Plus, with even more savings promised, but one crucial difference – a contract agreement will now be required. “Classic” plans on their part will be much like the current Even More option.

For Value plans, you can pick between 200MB for $5, 2GB for $10, 3GB for $15, 5GB for $25 or 10GB costing you $55, but no web features are required. Additionally, you can bundle the plan with unlimited texts for $5 monthly. Value plans also have 21-month Equipment Installment Plan for the full price of equipment. The new rate plans are detailed below:

1000 minutes for $49.99, $5 to add a line
2000 minutes for $59.99, $5 to add a line
Unlimited plan to which you can add a line with 500 minutes for $5, or $20 for unlimited minutes

Other peculiarities of the plans, are the fact that once in a Value plan you can't go back to Classic, while migrating the other way around to Value could cost you from $0 to $200. Folks over at TmoNews warn us to take this with a grain of salt as it's far from confirmed, but a change is certainly on the way so stay tuned.

source: TMoNews

14 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 29 Jun 2011, 11:12

1. DigitalMD222222 (unregistered)


Unfortunately I expect things to get worse rather than better for the entire Smart device community with Google beginning to put a strangle hold on the ANdroid source code and the big cell boys throttling or tier pricing data. I expect a general slow down in progress while everyone tries to make a buck or two.

posted on 29 Jun 2011, 11:27 1

2. remixfa (Posts: 13910; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


there wouldnt even be a point to redoing the EM+ plans. the whole point was it was no contract. Why would someone want to be under contract and still have to pay full retail for the device? Granted the plans are uber cheap but ur still locked in which goes against the whole idea of the EM+ plan..

posted on 30 Jun 2011, 02:02

11. ssjassassin (Posts: 108; Member since: 31 Aug 2009)


EM+ is going away forever. This is going to replace the traditional contract. You are paying less for the service and paying for the phone over time. The contract is because the cost of the service is so cheap. What you can expect is to buy a phone in store for the regular contract price. You will then pay the rest off over time to the no contract price point. The end point is that your going to pay less than customers do now with T-Mobile including the cost of the phones.

posted on 30 Jun 2011, 06:14

13. DUH (unregistered)


With the EM+ if you elected to use the payment option, if I remembered correctly was over 20 months, t-mobile required you to have that service for the time period equal to that of the payment. Basically u If you truly wanted to be month to month u would have to pay for the phone up front. Granted with th value u option the eliminate the option of no contract in its entirety but how many t-mobile customers were actually paying full price to go month to month, I suspect they realized the EM+ customers were using the payment option, opting for service agreement over 20 months, that's contract language without using the actual term contract.

posted on 30 Jun 2011, 11:31

14. remixfa (Posts: 13910; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


no, EM+ was no contract period. If you did the payment plan then yea, you were billed for the cost of the phone. The problem was a lot of people that didnt care about their credit went n get multiple smartphones by putting down the initial 20 dollar first payment then never paid their bills. Tmobile lost a lot of money on it which is why it went to the background.

EM+ has never left, its still availible if u go into the store, u just wont find anyone actively selling it.

posted on 29 Jun 2011, 12:04

3. Gizmos (unregistered)


What is the point to having new plan? You (Tmobile) going to belong to ATT. Really

posted on 29 Jun 2011, 13:29

4. The_Miz (Posts: 1496; Member since: 06 Apr 2011)


*sniffs* I smell AT&T decisions here.

posted on 29 Jun 2011, 14:13 1

5. oddmanout (Posts: 435; Member since: 22 May 2009)


Changing the plans isn't necessarily a bad thing nor without reason. T-mobile might be bought by AT&T but that doesn't mean that they shouldn't bother competing. Regardless of whether the buyout goes through, they still are an active company and why not make moves for the better to attract more customers? Its not like AT&T has taken over already and ever cent they make belongs to AT&T.

posted on 29 Jun 2011, 14:43 1

6. remixfa (Posts: 13910; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


besides, the lower they make their plans now, the more it will ANNOY ATT when they will have to abide by these super low contract prices.. lol :)

I hope the month before the merger, they drop down to 50 bux unl everything or less on contract and advertise the hell out of it.. :)

Here's a question. Why are people still ATT customers knowing that they are about to have 30 million people on their network that pay half the price for the same service? Who's smarter? The ATT customer that stays with ATT and its high prices and tiered data, or the one that jumps to Tmo and comes back with the super cheap unlimited plan...
If your going to end up on the same network, why pay more?

posted on 30 Jun 2011, 02:08

12. ssjassassin (Posts: 108; Member since: 31 Aug 2009)


The reason they are changing it to these plans is so they are spending zero cash upfront on phones. It is like writing a check to DT now before the merger for more money. The fact is it is great for customers but really is only for the benefit T-Mobiles parent company.

posted on 29 Jun 2011, 15:58

7. btbotimtim (Posts: 147; Member since: 08 Dec 2010)


Contracts are required without subsidy?
How much is the early termination fee?
If there is ETF, why do they charge ETF for?

posted on 29 Jun 2011, 16:12

8. reader (unregistered)


The new value plans would cost you less each month (although still requiring a contract) because you either already have the phone you want to use, or you will simply pay full price for the device. The classic plans cost more because the cost of the phones are subsidized.

posted on 29 Jun 2011, 18:55

9. drew (unregistered)


Glad I locked in $59.99 unlimted a month. Woo hoo!

posted on 12 Jul 2011, 22:05

15. star_droid (Posts: 1; Member since: 12 Jul 2011)


well atleast you can purchase a phone on installment plan and get a lowest rate plan possible.. still a good thing though...

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories