T-Mobile reports lower net income for fourth quarter
0. phoneArena posted on 25 Feb 2010, 12:10
A drop in contract customers for Q4 is one of the reasons why T-Mobile reported a drop in net income for the last three months of last year...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. Homotechual posted on 20 Oct 2010, 01:45 0 0
Good for T-Mobile, Now watch that number double every year with the improvments T-Mobile is making with their handsets, and coverage. What the article FAILS to notice is OBVIOUSLY T-Mobile is going to lose contract customers, not because their lower income customers, because they have NO CONTRACT plans now. Most the customers switching from AT&T and Verizon I switch at T-Mobile are going on the Even More PLUS plans. Meaning NO CONTRACT*
2. herbiederb posted on 25 Feb 2010, 12:32 0 0
Agreed. +1 I will be a new T-Mo customer on March 24th... SOLD!
3. remixfa posted on 25 Feb 2010, 13:02 0 0
id say 95% of new customers are no contract. That doesnt mean they are bad credit prepays (of course, we still have those too), but the cost benifit of going no contract far outweighs getting a contract plan, even with the full price phones included. I only ever pull out the contract plan card just to show how much they really save by going even more plus (no contract). whoever wrote this article needs to keep up with the times. Yea the ARPU went down a bit because the new plans are uber cheap. And in a time of 10%+ unemployment and job uncertanty, those super cheap no contract plans are starting to appeal to a huge audience... and not just to the metro users. I dunno about you but weve been like 150% to quota every month since EMP came out. the true "fastest 3g network", nationwide coverage on par(or better than) ATT, no contracts, kickass phones, and cheap as hell plans... how can u go wrong? LOL.
6. theman10 posted on 25 Feb 2010, 16:44 0 0
That was such a dumb comment, full of inaccuracies and lies
4. rwolf1984 posted on 25 Feb 2010, 14:25 0 0
T-Mo and Sprint need to be careful with their no contract option. Falling profit and income isnt good...I am not worried so much about T-Mo cuz if T-Mo in Europe wanted to make the investment in T-Mo USA they could be the #1 carrier. @ Remixfa T-Mo is not the fastest. AT&T and Sprint are according to PC World survey...
8. remixfa posted on 25 Feb 2010, 19:16 0 0
yea, and according to that, they didnt test in Philladelphia where tmobile is running its new HSPA+ network at 21mbps. Which is also where they reviewed the new Web connect Rocket Internet card and said its faster than sprints WiMax in real world usage. ATT's max is 7.2mb/s, Sprint and Verizon's max is about 3mb/s, Tmobiles Max is 21mb/s. (ATT's max and Tmobiles Max are not nationwide) Easy math. And.. theman.. can you point out all the "lies and inaccuracies" with some factual evidence? :)
5. Homotechual posted on 25 Feb 2010, 15:51 0 0
I don't look at PC WORLD, I look at Consumer Reports and T-Mobile was ranked #2 based off of an overall score beatng AT&T and Sprint.
7. arleslie posted on 25 Feb 2010, 18:58 0 0
Tmobile's no contact plans appeals to the general consumers, they still have the best phones,plans, and the best representatives. Based on my experience, they cater to everybody's needs whether its pre, flexpay and post pay. Coverage has been an issue sometimes, but would not trade carriers even for an iphone.
9. mattkl posted on 25 Feb 2010, 20:58 0 0
Well the fact that T-Mobile tends to be getting the more appealing phones leads me to believe the phone manufactures know something we don't. Never forget that businesses are out to make money and if they see something good or know of a way to make money they will. I am curious to see HSPA come out nation wide from T-Mobile and test it out. They were so behind with 3G I bet they won't make that mistake again with their HSPA.