Study shows that video playbacks look better on Android 4.3 than on Android 4.4
0. phoneArena 30 Nov 2013, 15:04 posted on
A company called OptoFidelity conducted some tests using its own OptoFidelity VideoMultimeter and various versions of the Nexus 7 tablet. The tests revealed that video playbacks look better on Android 4.3 than on Android 4.4. Even stranger, the best picture was seen on the older version of the Nexus 7 powered by Android 4.3...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. androiphone20 (Posts: 1394; Member since: 10 Jul 2013)
This really caught me by surprise when I read about it earlier on Techcrunch, wasn't Kitkat supposed to be smoother?
2. jraymp (Posts: 2; Member since: 27 Nov 2013)
That's why they lowered the minimum required RAM to 512MB.?
4. BReND0 (Posts: 58; Member since: 07 Dec 2010)
I agree. I noticed the youtube and netflix video ony 4.3 nexus 2012 looked crispier, sharper then on my 4.4 updated nexus 2013
6. Finalflash (Posts: 1460; Member since: 23 Jul 2013)
Those charts make no sense to me. So the nexus 7 2013 cannot run 1080p (60fps) at all but the 2012 model can. Also, the dropped frame percentage is insanely low on the 2013 model, but high on the 2012 model, yet you are saying it appears slower or stutters more on the 2013 model. I think that is what the charts are saying, so someone explain what they're talking about.
7. taz89 (Posts: 2009; Member since: 03 May 2011)
Not saying they are wrong but I have not really noticed anything wrong with video playback on 4.4. Even after reading this am not sure what am am suppose to be looking out for. Also this playback issue does it affect 3rd party players like mx player and dice player etc
8. Finalflash (Posts: 1460; Member since: 23 Jul 2013)
I just tested this with a 60fps video (hobbit 2 trailer) and even on MX it stutters badly. Might be something messed up internally due to over optimization maybe. Even so, maybe about 1% of the population of users might be affected due to the lack of 60fps videos out there, but this needs to be fixed sooner rather than later.
9. pyradark (Posts: 741; Member since: 10 Jun 2012)
Yehey Im not banned
10. Ninetysix (Posts: 1377; Member since: 08 Oct 2012)
Already in the android bug list (huge list!!!).
12. Finalflash (Posts: 1460; Member since: 23 Jul 2013)
Yea, but good thing it isn't as big or serious as Apple's list, sucks to be those poor saps.
15. JakeLee (Posts: 651; Member since: 02 Nov 2013)
It's not a bug, just a feature cheating on customers.
16. JC557 (Posts: 848; Member since: 07 Dec 2011)
And still a huge bug list for Apple software. From iOS7 issues to iTunes lag and the disappearance of useful features.
*Still sour about New Window option having been taken away and iTunes 10 is a slow piece of cr*p along with a lot of other things...
11. galanoth (Posts: 284; Member since: 26 Nov 2011)
I use BubbleUPnP and MX Player on my 2013 Nexus 7 to stream 1080p MKV files from my server.
I don't see any dropped frames. Maybe I'm just lucky.
19. PapaSmurf (Posts: 7414; Member since: 14 May 2012)
He is. Trolls go away if you ignore them.
20. joey_sfb (Posts: 2577; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)
JakeLee has a lot of stamina and time. Not surprising, guess there really nothing much you could do with iOS 7.
13. JakeLee (Posts: 651; Member since: 02 Nov 2013)
It's simply Google caught cheating on customers.
There are many points where the performance can be increased at the cost of precision while decoding multimedia contents. I wouldn't be surprised if Google did the same with audio decoding.
Increasing performance while retaining the same quality is called optimization. If the quality suffers, it's called cheating.
It looks like Google put some melamine into KitKat.
Scroogled. Shame on you, Google.
14. GoBears (Posts: 333; Member since: 27 Apr 2012)
Got KK on my Nex10 and I love it. If the video playback quality is worse I can't tell. Only thing I do notice is that battery life is awesome.
21. Taters (Posts: 2596; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)
Probably went from way better playback than IOS and Windows Phone, to just better playback than IOS and Windows Phone.
Sure older and less efficient Android phones did everything with no short cuts. But since Apple showed everyone that taking short cuts such as eliminating multitasking altogether works wonders on the bank account, Google finally decided to join the compromise and short cut party when it comes to video playback.
I personally haven't noticed the difference though.
23. JakeLee (Posts: 651; Member since: 02 Nov 2013)
1. iPhones have always been offering the highest quality both in image and sound, no compromises. Surf the web, you'll find tons of professional, *unpaid* reviews proving this. (We all know who paid to reviewers in contrast)
2. iOS DOES multitask. It ALWAYS did. Only third party apps were prohibited from this for security reasons and transition to 64-bit. From iOS7, third party apps are allowed to multitask. (transition done)
Android gonna pay a very steep price for pre-maturely allowing multitasking to third party apps during the transition to 64-bit.
3. You know just as much as you notice - nothing.
25. GoBears (Posts: 333; Member since: 27 Apr 2012)
Get off Apple's package already fanboy. iOS can't even play back a simple flash video which is still very widely. Android will pay no price during the move to 64-bit. People said the same thing about PCs and it simply was not true.
26. GoBears (Posts: 333; Member since: 27 Apr 2012)
No compromises lol. Doesn't even have an HD screen.
27. WakaFlakaD (Posts: 360; Member since: 30 Apr 2011)
I thought there was a operating system stopped supporting Flash??
Well HTML5 is the future anyway
28. Ninetysix (Posts: 1377; Member since: 08 Oct 2012)
I'm just going to assume that you've never heard of Puffin browser. It'll play your flash content on iOS just fine. Sucks to be wrong doesn't it.
29. ihavenoname (Posts: 1269; Member since: 18 Aug 2013)
Android aint perfect, iOS aint perfect, WP aint perfect.
30. GoBears (Posts: 333; Member since: 27 Apr 2012)
Haha Puffin. That browser sucks. Go ahead and keep paying cash for apps to allow your smartphone to compete. That's exactly what Apple wants you to do.
31. GoBears (Posts: 333; Member since: 27 Apr 2012)
Not to mention that the flash is being played on puffins servers, not on your device. Have fun.
32. Ninetysix (Posts: 1377; Member since: 08 Oct 2012)
I thought you said iOS can't play flash? Now it can??? Must suck be wrong.
33. GoBears (Posts: 333; Member since: 27 Apr 2012)
Sorry if you don't the difference between having a real flash player installed that can be accessed by multiple browsers or a server based browser that plays flash for you then so be it. Enjoy your iphone with the my little pony ui bro. I'll enjoy mine.
35. Ninetysix (Posts: 1377; Member since: 08 Oct 2012)
36. Taters (Posts: 2596; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)
Lol sure they have been offering then highest quality in both image and sound. Is that why when I do YouTube comparisons between an iPhone and android phone the Android always wins.
Yes the superior resolution on Android phones might have something to do with them winning but they seem to win in everything else as well and that includes stream quality.
37. Taters (Posts: 2596; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)
The last test they did was on how poor the iPhone touch sensitivity is. I am sure if they tested iPhone stream quality it would fall well below both 4.3 and 4.4.
39. JakeLee (Posts: 651; Member since: 02 Nov 2013)
Do you have to try so hard to prove that you are a moron?
The test was performed by the same Optofidelity with their industry machines for *factories* for sorting out *defective* parts at the assembly line.
The vendors only have to port the driver and run a simple factory calibration on the touchscreen, and if the touchscreen is not *defective*, the results are the same as shown on GS4.
It's such a trivial thing.
There is NO single vendor that would have difficulties with this step.
Apple went much further and applied their proprietary heuristics for better UX based on comprehensive studies on human behavior.
Of course it seems to be somewhat off when it's operated by a stupid machine.
You Androtakus indeed need salvation.
38. JakeLee (Posts: 651; Member since: 02 Nov 2013)
Wow, you are naïve!
YouTube is currently flooded with *paid* "reviewers".
Just contact some named "reviewers" pretending being an app developer for example, they will bluntly ask for money, the amount depending on their number of subscribers.
The world must be very beautiful for you. I really envy you.
22. 1701nino (Posts: 228; Member since: 07 Dec 2010)
I have no problem with my Nexus 4,as far as video is concerned everything looks to be the same as before.
But the again if this is true,then google should be seriously be woried because apple would never allow this.