x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Options
    Close




Sprint's Adib to report on the carrier's LTE build out at a company conference

0. phoneArena 24 Oct 2012, 13:32 posted on

According to Sprint, the nation's third largest carrier has added 11 LTE enabled smartphones to its lineup this year, on pace to reach the hoped for 15 LTE enabled models; more than 1 million LTE phones have been sold by the carrier despite a very small LTE footprint at this point...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 24 Oct 2012, 13:40 2

1. Jyakotu (Posts: 818; Member since: 12 Dec 2008)


I get a little frustrated with Sprint when I see news of new 4G LTE markets being turned on, but most of them are smaller towns and not any of the major cities. I got a GNex now, mainly because I wanted a 4G LTE phone and the pure Android experience. The phone is great, but the network? Anything but. I know Sprint is going to turn on 4G LTE in Charlotte, N.C., but honestly, I don't know if I can wait any longer. T_T

posted on 24 Oct 2012, 13:51 1

2. hcbarclay (Posts: 62; Member since: 20 Dec 2009)


I COMPLETELY agree. I was once an employee of Sprint and I live in Indy and we have been having spotty LTE and no announcement as to when it will be completely live and unrestricted. They caught a lot of heat here locally for the poor service that customers have been experiencing. Honestly, I own a new business and cannot afford to have what I consider< "bargain basement service"...get with it Sprint!! Unlimited DATA IS NOT ENOUGH TO KEEP YOUR CUSTOMERS IF THEY DROP MULTIPLE CALLS A DAY!!!

posted on 24 Oct 2012, 14:33

3. Hamburglar (Posts: 8; Member since: 08 Aug 2012)


I too live in Indy. There were/are a lot of things I like(d) about Sprint. But they really do need to step up their coverage. I noticed a significant drop in coverage (especially data) when they brought the iPhone on board. Their data speeds went downhill quick and never recovered up until I switched to AT&T in February 2012. I would really like to go back to Sprint. But they are really going to have to improve their coverage, especially data. They need to build more towers to cover more area, attain better building penetration, and bump their data speeds. I was testing 200-300 kbps all around Indy when I left them. And I was using 3 different devices to get them numbers. I'm locked in for a little over a year with AT&T. So I am hoping they can get their act together before then. Otherwise I will probably just renew with AT&T.

posted on 24 Oct 2012, 14:55 3

4. SellPhones82 (Posts: 488; Member since: 11 Dec 2008)


Also live in Indy (Southside) and also debated on leaving as my contract was about up from when I bought the original EVO. When I saw Indy was on the list of "100 Markets to launch in the coming months" I figured I'd hang around. 3G data was decent in some areas and atrocious in others. Where I work (Plainfield) I'll get 37Kbps connection! Now as of Monday I finally turned on the LTE on my GS3 and to my surprise, I have 4g all over the place. It works at my house, work, and other areas I'm at on a weekly basis like Greenwood. That being said, the 3G is still pretty bad and I thought the whole Network Vision was to improve 3G as well but I have yet to see that. It could be due to the fact that they have not officially launched this market but I'd thin kthey are getting close.

posted on 24 Oct 2012, 15:32 2

5. Contreramanjaro (Posts: 153; Member since: 04 Dec 2011)


Getting people on the LTE towers alone will improve 3G for those remaining devices. That being said I have to say the Indianapolis roll out is going pretty darn well for a place that wasn't expected to get done until December. I live in Muncie and there are reports of Sprint LTE up here too.

Also, as a side note, in the last 6 or so years I've had Sprint I've had a whopping 5 dropped calls. And that includes some extensive time driving through the country. I guess I'm just lucky.

posted on 24 Oct 2012, 16:34

7. threeline (Posts: 256; Member since: 11 Sep 2011)


I was just up that way Indy/Muncie and Fort Wayne and I could barely maintain a signal and I have the Galaxy Nexus. So I have a hard time believing that one when all I did was drop calls for the week I was there. Sprint's service sucks and this is definitely my last round with them, I will pay more for reliable service.

posted on 24 Oct 2012, 20:09

10. Contreramanjaro (Posts: 153; Member since: 04 Dec 2011)


Yeah... I don't know what is causing your problem. Maybe the phone? It's not like the signal is fantastic but it's there.

In fact, I've actually run a sensorly "map trip" thing from Muncie to Bloomington (phone got very warm) and it shows solid signal on the map. I have an Evo Design and before that the Instinct. I'm not trying to stop you leaving. I don't care at all. I just am throwing my 2 cents in since it's an area I'm familiar with. And an area I consistently have stronger signal than my ATT friends. If you leave may I suggest Verizon? Best of luck to you.

posted on 24 Oct 2012, 19:20

8. Hamburglar (Posts: 8; Member since: 08 Aug 2012)


Have you tried testing the speed on Sprint's LTE coverage? I use the Speedtest app by Oookla. I am just curious about the numbers.

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 00:16

11. KFear (Posts: 137; Member since: 06 Feb 2012)


Everyone is complaining about service in a small area. I just want to remind everyone of the topic at hand here and that also Sprint is a network that has a goal to expand across the country where populations exist the most. I'm not saying that nobody lives in your areas, but that a network can not be everywhere and that Sprint is a business that has to make many business decisions on what makes the most financial sense for their network AND their business.

Verizon doesn't reach everywhere either, nor do i expect it too. A carrier doesn't suck because you can't make a call in your kitchen. bottom-line

posted on 24 Oct 2012, 15:35 1

6. Even4steven (Posts: 36; Member since: 03 Aug 2012)


I finally gave up and left for Verizon a few months ago. REAL 4G is unbelievable. The carrier is more important then the phone. There I said it...

posted on 24 Oct 2012, 20:01

9. elandrumiii (Posts: 109; Member since: 20 Mar 2010)


I am in Atlanta and i can say its not just Indiana. I have had LTE turned on for over 2 months and It has actually gotten worse (LTE that is) 3g is not great but not horrible, I can still get a decent signal. WiMax is actually stronger than 3G sometimes. I still have an OG Evo here. They say I am covered but you know what that means. I am a breath away from AT&T. Dumping my tablet already got rid of the tablet and overdrive then by December the GNex may be gone and i will put the V950 on the account to ride out the contract.

posted on 25 Oct 2012, 11:18

12. maddashell (Posts: 6; Member since: 07 Aug 2012)


Who's care's about patents. It's a bunch of beat around the bush type of s***. When is everybody going to get LTE. They have all these devices sold, with no service. That should be there main focus and that is getting LTE out to it's users. We are so far behind, by the time we get LTE, they'll have something out even better and faster. It's crap, F*** the patents, get LTE rolled out...........come on sprint!!!!!

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories