Sprint lawsuit mildly hints the carrier will indeed get the iPhone
1. steven252000 posted on 07 Sep 2011, 04:18 3 0
Hmm....pretty sure they are suing AT&T not Apple........but as sue happy as everyone is maybe it's both ;>)
5. remixfa posted on 07 Sep 2011, 06:16 2 1
they arent suing apple. they are using the iphone as an example of supersized carrier exclusivity periods because of their size over the competition. Basically he's arguing if sprint were as big as ATT/VZW then VZW wouldnt have gotten an exclusive time window on the iphone4.
And to that I say... people chose to go to VZW/ATT. If you couldnt compel them to move to sprint, thats not anti competitive measures, thats bad reputation and advertising. Sprint's rates are cheaper and the network has pretty good coverage over all. Its notorious anti-customer service antics did more to keep sprint down over time than lack of an iphone, so I dont think the arguement has merrit for the anti merger suite.
9. pattypatterson posted on 07 Sep 2011, 09:20 4 1
this is craziness...not one person in their right mind would ever go to att because they have great coverage. It was for 1 reason and 1 reason only....people leaving for vzw is a different story they are clearly the best carrier for coverage and have by far the best brand for wireless carriers...seriously what does att have to offer if you took away the iphone? data caps, poor service, and expensive plans.
11. Phoneguy007 posted on 07 Sep 2011, 11:47 0 0
I agree with remix.... actually att does have better coverage then sprint i mean really... second no one even knew that the iphone was going to be as a great device you cant blame att because they got it first...second att plans are almost the same as any other company sprint has raised ther prices and the will throttle their service or cap thier data if they ever get as many smart phone users as att and verizion.
14. pattypatterson posted on 08 Sep 2011, 10:12 0 0
no one is blaming att for carrying the iphone first my point was that remix said people came to att for reasons besides getting the iphone which is ludicrous and also take a look at every sample done in the last couple years for call quality and service its always vzw sprint 1 and 2 and tmobile and att flip flop back and fourth between 3rd and 4th example consumer reports and every tech magazine out there and att customers are always the least satisfied...the only good thing about gsm is there 3g speeds which are definitely faster then cdma which is a non issue with widespread lte right around the corner...as for plans att 39.99 base 450 min 20 for text and 25 for 2gb of data!!! or pay 79.99 for truly unlimited data
15. MachineGunKelly (unregistered) posted on 08 Sep 2011, 23:07 1 0
I have worked for both ATT and Sprint Customer Care and Technical Support. I can tell you with no bias that Sprint has far better coverage than ATT. 30% of the calls I get at ATT are coverage/reception related.
2. jtype (unregistered) posted on 07 Sep 2011, 04:53 3 1
how is this any different from when sprint bought nextel? there was talk for a while about sprint purchasing tmobile before att. so its ok only if sprint is the company doing the buying? when att or verizon does it they are stifling competition. instead of competing, they decide to sue their way out of last place. congrats sprint!
3. jtype (unregistered) posted on 07 Sep 2011, 04:54 3 1
or maybe its because everything sprint invests in turns to crap. nextel, wimax/clear, and soon lightsquared. loss leader of the wireless industry for a reason
4. Droid_X_Doug posted on 07 Sep 2011, 06:00 1 0
I wonder how any Sprint customers are holding off upgrading (or moving to VZW) to see what develops regarding Sprint getting an iPhone?
7. Dj21o posted on 07 Sep 2011, 07:38 1 0
I pretty much gave up on waiting for a decent WP7 to Sprint, so it is a battle of the GSII and the iPhone 5 for me. Kind of right in the middle of which one to get. ;)
6. dsayegh (unregistered) posted on 07 Sep 2011, 07:37 0 0
I still remember the days when Sprint had the leading edge phones, and verizon was somewhat behind the times, where it seemed all there phones ran the same software -all well before the iphone.
I don'y know the exact numbers,but If Sprint was to buyT-mobile I think the remaining three carriers would have been a little more balanced.
as for AT&T, I think it's exclusive offering of the iphone made it what it is today, I personnally did not get the iphone because it was on At&t.