Sony Xperia Z can be used as an underwater cam, watch it film inside a swimming pool
0. phoneArena posted on 15 Feb 2013, 08:54
The best camera, they say, is the one you have with you. That’s why it’s no surprise smartphones are quickly replacing point-and-shoots…
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. _Bone_ posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:01 2
They should've focused on land camera performance instead of underwater, same goes for the screen viewing over making it idiot-proof.
3. rusticguy posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:03 3
They are probably aiming to sell under water. These are nothing but gimmicks. They should have concentrated more on battery :)
8. rusticguy posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:14 0
Yea probably they want it for recording how they are tortured in Japanese waters so that IOC could consider turning down Japan's 2020 bid for Olympics.
15. pwnarena posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:26 4
maybe just feelin bitter because sammy and nokia can't do it with their high end devices. it's the same thing with why would you want to have a camera that can take good low light photos. are you spying on someone behind the shadows? why do you need a splitting screen while watching a movie and monitoring the stock market on your GN when you can just buy two diferent devices at lower prices? these new features serve some good purposes but fans of competing brands just refuse to acknowledge that they can also be useful.
26. rusticguy posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:42 0
Imate did all this way back with their military grade QWERTY phone that they made Nothing very special about this...
46. SitiHardiyantiRukmana posted on 16 Feb 2013, 09:42 0
This is a phone for LIFEGUARD.
If baywatch still on tv, I bet sony will give David Hasselhoff and the team a Sony Xperia Z.
9. lee480 posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:15 0
If I took Galaxy S3 for a swim, what will happen?? :)
17. pwnarena posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:28 0
you wouldn't be too stupid to take a device to water with you when you know the device can't endure getting in contact with water. you will by a waterproofing case first. invalid argument.
please, if you support xz, make more sensible comments. sony fans need to have some class unlike those brainwashed sammy cult followers.
12. _Bone_ posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:21 1
Why would I go underwater WITH A PHONE! Hello?
But gotta give props for marketing. Dusting off $300 extra profit never was this easy.
19. PhoneArenaUser posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:32 5
Maybe you won't, but maybe other will, world is big and there is more people than only you! I even don't talk that there still is a chance that phone may get wet by accident and that's mean IP57 certificate is advantage not disadvantage!
28. _Bone_ posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:49 0
Sony fanatics already wet themselves so I guess the IP57 certificate comes handy ;) but I tell you right now: SIX WEEKS and dozens of them will storm forums infuriated, claiming Sony cheated them cause the phone went to the crapper on their first jump into the swimming pool. Which of course is because it's not really an underwater gadget as the video advertises, the 1m resistance is not enough even for pocket depth, and most ppl's hands go below that while swimming.
There will be lawsuits by ppl. who accidentally dropped the phone while fooling around in the pool or sea as 3 feets under is game over, so the world might be big, but the Z's underwater resitance is quite shallow.
24. rgxVOiD posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:38 2
The question is not why, but why not.
25. PhoneArenaUser posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:39 0
Sometimes data inside the phone is more worth than a phone by itself so IP57 certificate is handy advantage for a phone even if you won't going to dive in to the pool with it. I even don't talk that there still is a chance that phone may get wet by any other accidents than only a pool.
14. GTR722 posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:24 4
Read more reviews of the Z. The only one where they troll the camera is in this Samsung site. Phone Arena is a well know Sony hater site, look at the reviews of their phones and compare it with samsung. Just the Xperia P and the GS3 Mini one is a disgrace.
29. _Bone_ posted on 15 Feb 2013, 10:11 0
Or they tested all phones unlike you, therefore have an objective view. A poll would probably make the S3 the phone of the year, yet it didn't even make PhoneArena top3 of 2012, where a Samsung landed both in the worst phone and worst tablet category. So your suggestion of preferential treatment is complete rubbish.
31. pwnarena posted on 15 Feb 2013, 12:22 0
the inconsistency in their comparison findings makes everything dubious. lumia getting beaten in lowlight? forget about the possibility that the xz used here is defective or has been made to work to its disadvantage. if there's one thing the lumia is known for, it's its photography skills. the inconsistency here is suspect.
36. HDShatter posted on 15 Feb 2013, 15:37 1
Sony has stated that the phone at CES was a prototype. The final version has an IPS with same view angles as the droid dna.
The final version is much better than the prototype that most of the reviews are based on. Sony has also done an amazing job at hardware driver optimization and this phone beats the Droid DNA in benchmarks.
47. emadshiny posted on 16 Feb 2013, 12:52 0
i heard the same thing as well. hope it come true.
38. HDShatter posted on 15 Feb 2013, 18:46 1
"A Sony representative also claimed the pre-production/DEMO/beta models were made using cheap materials and also the screen was glued by hand and not set properly as the production models, simply because they wanted the devices to be ready for CES 2013 and due to the amount of demo units they wanted to send out asap and that the production models would be better. " The final versions view angles are fine.
45. sharks posted on 16 Feb 2013, 06:00 1
It's so easy when you can't think of anything else to trash-talk about on this device, other than its already great land camera performance (which works equally well on land AND under water, and that's something you simply cannot find in other phones at this time) and the viewing angles are already very decent. There is no smartphone right now that fits those perfect specs but the Xperia Z is the closest you can find. So, for the haters, keep away from the keyboard and just keep waiting.
One of the many amazing uses i have planned when i get my pre-ordered Xperia Z is the ability to take it with me on vacations and keep it with me all the time, despite any type of bad weather (rain, sand or dust storms) and not have to worry about the phone at all. When on my next swimming trip (lake, sea or whatever), i no longer have to leave it behind on land (and worry about someone snooping or outright stealing my beautiful 5" device) and the best part is while snorkelling, i can now take pictures of underwater marine life which has always fascinated me. I no longer have to try and describe to my friends what i saw in the water that day. A quick reach for my (for safety of not losing it into the abyss, wrist-strapped) Xperia Z and that unique moment is immortalized. I'm no professional diver or underwater photographer that would consider investing in $1000+ special underwater cameras, so the Xperia Z is makes complete sense and the underwater camera functionality is absolutely perfect.
Thanks, and those who thumb down, i hope you'll find a way to get in a lake or sea, some day in your life.
2. meXpersonified posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:03 9
now dats a smartphone ...dat can be truely urs no matter where u go and what u do !...
beast which doesnt come wid "handle me wid care" tag ..atleast i want to spend less time worrying about my phone !!
39. HDShatter posted on 15 Feb 2013, 18:51 1
I'm sure everyone sometime in their life time will have their phone dropped into water or have water spilled on it. Better to be safe than sorry.
6. p5yb0rg (unregistered) posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:12 0
I will NEVER buy another sony phone.. In terms of comparable pricing to features, Sony phones are drastically overpriced and do not provide any significant features to justify their high costs. Sony does not offer anything but subpar performance and their support in terms of software updates, is by far the worst I've seen. The Xperia Z would probably never see the likes of KLP, it should be tossed in a pool and left there.
11. emadshiny posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:20 2
so you can buy Iphone with its affordable price. LOL.
18. p5yb0rg (unregistered) posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:31 0
No thanks, I'm with HTC all the way
21. pwnarena posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:34 1
htc butterfly is only splash resistant but it has a better display.
23. emadshiny posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:35 5
so you think HTC one is cheaper than this one?
you're wrong. it is more costly.
27. rgxVOiD posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:47 3
soo... burst mode (68 sec. = 999 photos), video HDR, dust/water resistance, superior auto, dragontail glass, glonass, low SAR value, and being just a little larger than GSIII while having a bigger screen counts as "does not offer anything", then I don't know what you want. Subpar performance you say? Xperia V is faster than GSIII in most of the benchmarks and that's dual-core so this should not be subpar. Software updates, we'll see, time will tell
32. pwnarena posted on 15 Feb 2013, 12:23 0
or in the case of the xzl, smaller than the galaxy s3 but with a bigger display screen.
34. robotgedek posted on 15 Feb 2013, 12:40 0
agreed on the poor updates. they should improve their service, coz costumers are the king!
40. HDShatter posted on 15 Feb 2013, 18:52 0
If the Xperia Z and ZL live up to the hype and sell well hopefully Sony will keep them updated.
7. amiroo posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:13 0
oooo plz enough we know thats water resistance but xperia have only this advantage!!؟؟
its not enough plz produce it for dolphin or shark under the water..
20. pwnarena posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:33 2
funny via via articles....
phone arena posts a "via gsmarena" article that gsmarena drew from (via) a youtube vid which was posted by an asian blogger.
22. gulfdice posted on 15 Feb 2013, 09:34 0
Visit MartRing.com where everyday is a Blackfriday. Clearnance deals from top retailers. MartRing.com is the place to find black friday deals posted which are refreshed every hour.
33. smdeezy posted on 15 Feb 2013, 12:27 1
I think that's awesome. Who would complain about making a phone waterproof? Anything you can do to enhance durability is a good thing. Some people just complain about everything!
35. TheMan posted on 15 Feb 2013, 13:34 0
Great to be able to do this...AND it address the larger-than-you'd-expect "I dropped the phone in the toilet" market.
42. spiderpig2894 posted on 15 Feb 2013, 19:15 0
Yes, water and dust resistance, Exmor RS, Bravia Engine 2 are gimmicks. What can you do? That is the marketing strategy of some companies like Samsung has also overrated their AMOLED Displays, creating gimmick about octa-core, stylus, big screens, etc. Also look at Apple. Apple also emphasized the very old panorama feature in their iOS6.
Yes, they are overrated but still those features still come in handy, those features do things at least. All I hear are fanboyism here. If Samsung created a water and dust resistant flagship of course Samsung fanboys will say "OMG that is a great feature from Samsung! Im gonna buy that one!". Same as to the Apple fans.
44. iushnt posted on 15 Feb 2013, 21:11 0
The water resistant is something that I like in xperia z.. But is it really safe to take it under water purposely? This feature is good when we have accidental spill of liquid on phone but when doing it purposefully and if it gets destroyed by water then does the warranty cover it? A phone may get few drops and rough handling during certain phase of its usage. Will that affect this feature?? . I have seen in a video where 2 XZ was dropped and then put in a jar of water.. One of them gets off due to water which got leaked by the impact of drops.. I think underwater photography in this phone isn't safe and is just gimmicky. But who knows?