x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Options
    Close




Softbank won't let Sprint spend a fortune on Clearwire deal

0. phoneArena 14 Dec 2012, 08:05 posted on

Yesterday we wrote that Sprint is looking to acquire the remainder of Clearwire at a price of $2.90 per share. While the proposal is said to be currently evaluated, it looks like the carrier won't be able to go much higher than that, in case the board of Clearwire doesn't see the offering tempting enough...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 14 Dec 2012, 08:20 5

1. richardyarrell2011 (banned) (Posts: 510; Member since: 16 Mar 2011)


Soft bank and Sprint are both soft. Tmobile rules both.

posted on 14 Dec 2012, 09:06

5. cripton805 (Posts: 907; Member since: 18 Mar 2012)


^^^ lol

posted on 14 Dec 2012, 09:42

6. 412Even (Posts: 2; Member since: 14 Dec 2012)


AGREED! Tmobile rules price wise but lack good phones. Only great phone they have in the SGS3

posted on 14 Dec 2012, 09:45 2

8. JohnnyBravo (Posts: 105; Member since: 02 Dec 2012)


Ahem! Nexus 4???? T-Mos price are good but I am not too sure about their coverage.

posted on 14 Dec 2012, 10:32

10. g2a5b0e (Posts: 1927; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)


I suppose the Galaxy Note II isn't great either.

posted on 14 Dec 2012, 11:50

12. archangel9 (Posts: 230; Member since: 07 Feb 2010)


I guess the GNote II isnt a great phone.And their coverage is waayyy more better

posted on 14 Dec 2012, 11:03

11. DonkeySauce (Posts: 138; Member since: 03 Dec 2011)


Sprint is run less by Hesse, and more by Murphy. Murphy's law that is. Just one bad decision after another.

posted on 14 Dec 2012, 13:26 3

13. Sprintfan (Posts: 68; Member since: 18 Nov 2011)


Haha Donkeysauce, You really are an a$$. So when Sprint has more spectrum for LTE than ATT/VZW combined and builds a better faster network than VZW how is that a bad decision. He$$e owns your face.

posted on 14 Dec 2012, 08:43 2

2. wumberpeb (Posts: 406; Member since: 14 Mar 2011)


Oh, but that spectrum...wouldn't want to let it fall into someone else's hands, would ya Sprint?

posted on 14 Dec 2012, 09:44 1

7. JohnnyBravo (Posts: 105; Member since: 02 Dec 2012)


of course not. They are the skinney chic next to two fat glutonous girls. They need to fight for whatever they can get. Do you remember how adamant Sprint CEO Hesse was againts the ATT & T-mobile deal??? He knew if ATT took over T-Mo it would spell doom for sprint.

posted on 14 Dec 2012, 09:00 2

3. cleon062 (Posts: 1; Member since: 14 Dec 2012)


"dailywireless.org/2012/02/03/dish-clarifies-lte-a​dvanced-plan/"

Major investors

posted on 14 Dec 2012, 09:05 2

4. cripton805 (Posts: 907; Member since: 18 Mar 2012)


Clearwire would be dumb to think their shares are worth $5-$8. Someone else would have to bid higher, but I dont see the need for VZW to have that expense right now. They can wait for cheaper because they have the money and they are fine with what they have right now. I don't see Att&t buying it either. Sprint is the best candidate.

posted on 14 Dec 2012, 09:47 2

9. asulect (Posts: 130; Member since: 27 Aug 2012)


This reminds me of Yahoo refusing Microsoft's offer to buy it a few years ago, only a year or two later begged Microsoft to buy it which Microsoft was not interested anymore.

Clearwire maybe making the same mistake.

posted on 15 Dec 2012, 13:26

16. Sprintfan (Posts: 68; Member since: 18 Nov 2011)


Trying to understand your logic for comparison. In 2008 msft wanted a search engine and yahoo was worth 44bln at $31.00 a share. Its now 19.00 and was as low as $14.00 this year. Clearwire is undervalued still at like $3.30 a share up >100% this year. So yahoo was over-prices and clear is underpriced. Clearwire has no choice. Sprint owns 51%.

posted on 14 Dec 2012, 13:56

14. nyamo (Posts: 274; Member since: 19 Mar 2011)


Good to see someone in charge for sprint knows how not to screw up

posted on 14 Dec 2012, 22:23

15. skymitch89 (Posts: 982; Member since: 05 Nov 2010)


I don't really see why Clear would want much more than $3 per share seeing how they've been in a downward spiral for the past few years. I know that I would rather take a guaranteed $2.90 per share over a risky $5-$8 per share which the purchaser might walk away from. Also, I don't believe that SoftBank should have much say in how much Sprint buys Clear for considering that the deal between SoftBank and Sprint isn't even in the final stages yet. I think that if Sprint were to buy out Clear, then the deal between SoftBank and Sprint goes though, that it might really help with their LTE rollout.

posted on 15 Dec 2012, 13:33

17. Sprintfan (Posts: 68; Member since: 18 Nov 2011)


They do want more. If Sprint offered $2.90 and its over $3.00 and its still moving they will get a better deal. Sprint would also take CLWR's debt on which isnt good, THey have been in the red forever. Sprint just bought a small percent at the $2.90 mark a few weeks ago for 51% control so now a few weeks later CLWR wants more? Sprint pulled a sneaky one. I'm thinking now buying the whole things a few weeks ago might have been a mistake. Good article:http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-14/clearwire-mount-kellett-investor-spurns-sprint-offer.html?cmpid=yhoo "Even so, Clearwire’s spectrum could fetch a much higher price, Mount Kellett said. Using AT&T’s acquisition of wireless company NextWave Wireless Inc. as a benchmark, Clearwire’s spectrum -- including its used and unused airwaves -- is worth as much as $18 billion, the firm said. Including debt, estimated taxes on a spectrum sale and other costs, Clearwire’s net value works out to $9.2 billion, Mount Kellett estimated"

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories