Shots of the BlackBerry Niagara 9630 finally caught
Share:
The article has been updated
via CrackBerry
Share:
16 Comments
1. Charlie (unregistered) posted on 20 Oct 2010, 01:42 0 0
Even though I hate Verizon, I'm glad they're getting a good phone. I'm also glad the 9630 looks more like the 8900 that the 9000. I'm disappointed, though, that it probably won't have Wi-Fi.
3. VZWEMP posted on 05 Mar 2009, 23:09 0 0
this info is old regarding what carrier would be getting the niagra. but we are indeed getting it. i was actually just on a conference call earlier today regarding the device and its target launch date. but yea we're getting it.
5. ais250 posted on 06 Mar 2009, 10:08 0 0
So I'm leaving for Rome on 04/27 and will be there for 12 days... any chance I can ditch the BB Curve and get the new Niagra before I leave so I can have emails/calls with me??
7. FBBG posted on 06 Mar 2009, 11:41 0 0
Can you give us a hit on when this might be comin out?
12. trentsinmypants posted on 08 Mar 2009, 12:07 0 0
dont believe VZWEMP.....I too work for Verizon Wireless and I know, FOR A FACT, that we do not have a set date for release.
13. FBBG posted on 09 Mar 2009, 12:09 0 0
Can you let us know a round about date? I know you dont have a release date but you work for the company so have they annouced the month atleast?
6. VDubb posted on 06 Mar 2009, 10:17 0 0
Seriously, stop with the "no WiFi" comments. Verizon and Sprint haven't hand WiFi on any of their 3G BlackBerries (and no, the 8350i iDEN BB does not count) and odds are they won't have it on any in the future (at least on their CDMA networks). Though your opinion may differ, they believe their 3G networks are big enough to not require WiFi (thus reducing costs and size) since you're forced to pay for data for the device anyway. Their 3G networks are much bigger than AT&T and T-Mobile, so I found that WiFi was unnecessary when I had the Curve on Sprint and the Storm on Verizon before trying out the Bold on AT&T and now on the Curve 8900 for T-Mobile.
8. *HOVA* posted on 06 Mar 2009, 11:55 0 0
Even if their footprints are bigger why cripple it? What about inside buildings were wifi is prevelant and signal isn't? In my experiences in areas of wifi it runs just a little faster as well and who doesn't want that????
14. *HOVA* posted on 09 Mar 2009, 13:38 0 0
Yea because that's convenient to carry around a laptop because your phone doesn't have wifi, brilliant idea.
15. vzw fanman posted on 10 Mar 2009, 13:58 0 0
a lot of people carry around cell phones with wifi and laptops
11. bachinphx posted on 06 Mar 2009, 21:10 0 0
Okay. We all know that you all want WiFi on your BBs but we all know that with Verizon, it just ain't going to happen so get over it. If you want WiFi then go to a carrier like AT&T and may G'd be with you because their service SUCKS!!!! Also, for anyone who ever has used WiFi, you will know that it will suck every bit of life out of your battery in a hurry. Verizon's CDMA 3g network is just fine and I have had no issues. Just bring this bad boy on already. I know that it will be a cold day in hell when I go to the Storm. WAY too many issues.
16. lac84 posted on 12 Mar 2009, 23:01 0 0
Well for all your storm haters on here that also think you must have wi-fi, it is in fact wi-fi capable on Verizon Wireless. Too bad you still have to have the data package on it which is one in the same with every carrier that does offer wi-fi on their phones. Btw - Omnia - Wi-fi capable, Saga - wi-fi capable, HTC Touch Pro - Wi-fi capable, bb8330 - wi-fi capable if you know how to make it work, and wait until you see the rest of the smartphones launching this year that will also all be wi-fi capable.








