Entering the highly competitive Android space, every newcomer on the scene knows that the Samsung Galaxy S5 is highly regarded as the benchmark device to beat. That’s not all too surprising, especially when it’s super spec’d, rich with geeky hardware features, and a top performer in every meaningful category. Needless to say, the just announced Sharp AQUOS Crystal has a lot to live up to – so it’s intriguing to see how it can try to compete against one of the heavy hitters in the market.
To be fair, they’re both sporting similar constructions – plastic frames that have dimpled patterns. From a construction point of view, we can’t concretely say that one is sturdier than the other, but we have to mention the Galaxy S5’s water-resistant design. It surely helps in those occasions where the phone needs to get wet, so that’s incentive that you’ll need to think about when making a decision. Moreover, the Galaxy S5 benefits from an arsenal of features – like its fingerprint sensor, heart rate sensor, and IR blaster.
From a cursory look, we do like the neutral color reproduction of the Crystal’s display, as it doesn’t exhibit as much saturation as the Super AMOLED display of the Galaxy S5. Beyond that, the biggest head-turner here is the edgeless look of the Sharp AQUOS Crystal’s screen – it makes it so that the phone is considerably more compact in size than the Galaxy S5. Still, we need to point out the cool tech that’s in play with the Galaxy S5’s screen. In particular, we’re referring to screen’s AirView feature, which recognizes our finger as we hover it over the display.
Sharing the same basic features of Android, we’re inclined to say that Samsung’s TouchWiz interface offers us more features that prove valuable to the productivity-minded individual. And that’s despite the fact that we find the general presentation and look of the experience to be less appealing than the stock Android 4.4.2 KitKat experience of the Sharp AQUOS Crystal. Naturally, there are plenty of purists who say that the stock experience is the best Android experience out there, but other people will nonetheless be agreeable to the extensive enhancements dished up by Sammy’s TouchWiz experience.
Processor and Memory
Right from the onset, the Sharp AQUOS Crystal’s quad-core 1.2GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 processor with 1.5GB of RAM is able to match the performance of the Galaxy S5’s beefier hardware – a quad-core 2.5GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 SoC with 2GB of RAM. Sure, basic operations like navigating around the homescreens of each phone are executed similarly with the two, but we know that the Galaxy S5’s hardware is more than sufficient to run today’s 3D-rich games with minimal fluff, which is something we’re not too sure than the Crystal can handle.
In addition, we get a whole heck more storage capacity with Sammy’s pride and joy, since it provides us with an ample 32GB of internal memory – further supplemented by the availability of a microSD card slot. In contrast, there’s only a miniscule 8GB of storage with the Crystal, so it’s safe to presume that you’ll need to be more diligent in what you want to save.
If you’ve read our many photo comparison articles, you probably know that the Samsung Galaxy S5’s 16-megapixel camera is proven to be one of the best! In fact, we can say it’s as close to perfection as it can get, so that’s a lot to live up to for the Sharp AQUOS Crystal’s 8-megapixel camera. At half the tally, most people would already proclaim the Galaxy S5 to be the superior one, but until we actually snap some samples between the two and check them out, we’ll be reserved with our judgment.
After many years of fine tuning each of its successive devices, Samsung managed to hit it out of the park with the Galaxy S5. It’s truly a flagship smartphone in every facet, so each new competitor on the scene knows exactly what’s needed to stand a chance – or at least in the same level. The Sharp AQUOS Crystal gets our attention for its crazy looking edgeless display, but it’s going to need more than just that one astounding feature to topple the juggernaut in the Android space. Certainly, its lower price point is a good foundation for the phone, but until it can prove to be strong in all meaningful categories, it’s going to have to bow down to the king for now.