x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options

Samsung's hexa-core CPU is an Exynos 5260, more Galaxy Note 3 Neo photos and benchmarks revealed

0. phoneArena 10 Jan 2014, 12:17 posted on

Samsung has yet to announce the Galaxy Note 3 Neo and the Exynos 5260 SoC, but the company may unveil them both in the near future, possibly at MWC 2014...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 10 Jan 2014, 12:23 2

1. Wiki_jaan (Posts: 704; Member since: 24 Jun 2012)

i ll prefer sd600(if available ) instead this awkward hexa core

posted on 10 Jan 2014, 12:39 4

3. Shatter (Posts: 2036; Member since: 29 May 2013)

Keep your glorified a9 cores.

posted on 10 Jan 2014, 15:30 3

16. muhsen (Posts: 281; Member since: 07 Jun 2012)

A9 cores ??? SD600 has krait 300 cores which is equivalent A15's
and frankly , history tells that snapdragons r more powerful, stable and functional than Exynos (hello SD 800 note 3 can shoot 4k vids while exynos note 3 is still stuck on 1080p with 30 fps , not even 60 fps),,,not mention that SD galaxy s's and notes r selling alot better than the exynos versions( according to samsung)

posted on 10 Jan 2014, 18:01 1

19. spiderpig2894 (Posts: 588; Member since: 10 Jan 2012)

Yeah. Current SDs are awesome! LTE and 4K video! The Exynos Note 3 can capture 60fps.

posted on 10 Jan 2014, 18:14 2

20. Shatter (Posts: 2036; Member since: 29 May 2013)

Krait is based off A9 cores.

posted on 10 Jan 2014, 19:53

21. yowanvista (Posts: 340; Member since: 20 Sep 2011)

Krait is Qualcomm's own design implementation of ARM's IP, it does share some similarities with the A15 but it has nothing to do with the A9.

posted on 11 Jan 2014, 04:15

25. __0__ (banned) (Posts: 242; Member since: 07 Jan 2014)

more dev support on snapdragon . Proud to be a s800 note 3 owner . Snapdragon over crapxynos anyday

posted on 10 Jan 2014, 12:53

6. Extradite (banned) (Posts: 316; Member since: 30 Dec 2013)

A9 and A9+A15 are outdated and slow and old

Here comes the mighty A15s with all 6 cores running togeather.

posted on 11 Jan 2014, 00:06

22. Wiki_jaan (Posts: 704; Member since: 24 Jun 2012)

nah.......... its 2x a15 +4x a7

posted on 10 Jan 2014, 12:31

2. AppleHateBoy (unregistered)

2.2 GHz S800 Pretty Please!!!

posted on 10 Jan 2014, 14:17 11

12. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10452; Member since: 14 May 2012)

Then get a Note 3...

posted on 10 Jan 2014, 17:09

18. darkkjedii (Posts: 21141; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)


posted on 11 Jan 2014, 00:08

23. Wiki_jaan (Posts: 704; Member since: 24 Jun 2012)

i think samsung not going with sd800 coz it ll ruin n3 flagship some how

posted on 10 Jan 2014, 12:41

4. ianbbaa (Posts: 305; Member since: 20 Mar 2013)

I wish it would be 1280x800 like my first NOTE1 - same size but a bit bigger 5,5" with thinner bezels.
Then i can replace my S4 as a phone, sell NOTE 8 and hopefully ASUS Note8 will be also with 3G available to have a place in my dream setup for a while.
Smaller NOTE 3 and bigger S4 as a phone with Spen capabilities - tablet full WIN8 also with PEN. Great!!!

posted on 10 Jan 2014, 12:47 1

5. renz4 (Posts: 317; Member since: 10 Aug 2013)

to be honest i don't really understand the benefit having a group of low performance core combined with high performance core like the original exynos 5410. why need up to 4 low power core? surely 1 or two should be good enough. and from the early implementation of big.LITTLE ARM won't let you run both low perf and high perf core at the same time. josh from pc perspective says that nvdia approach with 4+1 might make more sense. why need so many cores for the low performance core?

posted on 10 Jan 2014, 12:54

8. Extradite (banned) (Posts: 316; Member since: 30 Dec 2013)

It has a3100mah battrry thats enough to pusg those A15s even clocked at 2.5....

posted on 11 Jan 2014, 05:56

29. levizx (Posts: 7; Member since: 05 Nov 2013)

Because it's easier to implement. As far as the software concerns there's just 4 cores with varying processing powers. Only one type of cores are visible to users and system.

posted on 11 Jan 2014, 09:05 1

31. Ishmeet (Posts: 111; Member since: 16 Sep 2013)

According to ARM, the A15 cores were designed to be performance beasts. They were too power hungry to be left running alone, unless a custom version like A7 cyclone or SD800 was made.
They themselves came up with the idea of Big.little architecture to achieve performance and battery life.

posted on 12 Jan 2014, 00:24

34. renz4 (Posts: 317; Member since: 10 Aug 2013)

isn't it nvidia come up with the idea big and small working together first with their 4+1 implementation in tegra 3? in nvidia implementation the companion core is still based on the same high performance core only occupying smaller die area and much lower clock. in ARM big.LITTLE they use low performance core that optimized much better for low power. in theory it should be better than nvidia low power companion but what i don't understand why need so many of them.
and no doubt the early revision of A15 is power hog. clock for clock it is faster than Krait 400 but the power consumption making it harder to clock it higher. exynos 5410 clocked around 1.6-1.7Ghz range max. only the later, 5420 were clock up to 1.9Ghz. Tegra 4 also have max clock of 1.9Ghz but so far only two device that i know of using T40X variant of tegra 4; nvidia shield and Asus transformer TF701T. other device based on tegra 4 most likely used the T40S variant that clocked at 1.8Ghz which i believe a variant that has been optimized more for heat and longer battery life by nvidia.

posted on 10 Jan 2014, 12:54

7. mottykels (Posts: 383; Member since: 15 May 2013)

So its not lte?

posted on 10 Jan 2014, 12:56 2

9. Extradite (banned) (Posts: 316; Member since: 30 Dec 2013)

Who uses LTE,,, it's to dam expensive. 3G is better and unlimited, i can't afford to pay $100 a month on Lte, to be used unlimited, or may be its much dearer..

posted on 10 Jan 2014, 14:15

11. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4275; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)

I love my LTE speeds, but HSPA+ 42 brings similar speeds for cheaper and less battery drain. Too bad the only carrier in the US that has it has sub-par coverage.

posted on 10 Jan 2014, 14:31 2

13. Extradite (banned) (Posts: 316; Member since: 30 Dec 2013)

Which carrier offers unlimited 4G.... No one. And 10Gb or 20Gb is not enough. I see hardly any diffrence in 4G.. surely it downloads 10 to 20 MbSec, but opening pages is still the same: exzample, om my Note3 when i open PhoneArena website, it takes nearly 18seconds to load the whole page with Flash. On a iNtel i5 7 seconds, i7 dam 4 seconds. To open a website that contains 190Mb. And that's on Wifi.

posted on 11 Jan 2014, 06:33

30. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4275; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)

T-Mobile, Sprint, and Verizon if you're grandfathered in. But you're right, there's very little real world differences between HSPA+ 42 and LTE.

posted on 10 Jan 2014, 14:42

15. Extradite (banned) (Posts: 316; Member since: 30 Dec 2013)

Tyler granter hasn't posted for a long time. He's great at. Cpu engenering and software side. I sometime see him in Anandtech, and those guys are on a diffrent levelof knoweldge on products. Reminds me off JakeLee

posted on 10 Jan 2014, 14:14 2

10. rd_nest (Posts: 1593; Member since: 06 Jun 2010)

This is getting seriously irritating now. I had a big debate on this few times in past. But you guys continue to do same mistake.

The purpose of HMP aka GTS is *NOT* to run all cores simultaneously. I will type it in BOLD now -- HMP WASN'T INTRODUCED TO RUN ALL CORES AT SAME TIME. That was not the purpose, the purpose is to invoke any combination of core s(whether big or small) as deemed necessary by the workload.

Running all cores at same time is one very small feature of HMP, and is not desirable. Please read the Linaro documentation properly. if you run a tech-site, I can atleast expect you to go through things like Linaro documentation and have basic understanding of HMP/GTS etc.,

posted on 10 Jan 2014, 14:38

14. Extradite (banned) (Posts: 316; Member since: 30 Dec 2013)

Having running 8cores than 4cores, 8cores will be much better. You will see absolutely no lags, cause it will have less strain on battery and run much smoother.

posted on 11 Jan 2014, 02:10 1

24. livyatan (Posts: 867; Member since: 19 Jun 2013)

Are you incapable of reading and understanding what the guy said above?

The main benefit in heterogeneous big.LITTLE is in POWER EFFICIENCY.
Can't wait to see the battery life tests of this sweet chip.

posted on 11 Jan 2014, 04:21

27. __0__ (banned) (Posts: 242; Member since: 07 Jan 2014)

snapdragon is still better than this crap

posted on 10 Jan 2014, 15:40 1

17. kwn0602 (Posts: 6; Member since: 10 Dec 2013)

If it is power and performance optimized, I am willing to buy it.

posted on 11 Jan 2014, 04:20

26. __0__ (banned) (Posts: 242; Member since: 07 Jan 2014)

I dont get it why Samsung love to make so many mid range crap devices , they already have a midrange note which is the note 2 !!!
Samsung should really stop making mid range devices , i understand about GS4 mini but what the heck is all the other device exist for ???
The phone that should be in Samsung's line up are the Galaxy Y neo , Galaxy S2 , GS4 mini , GS4 zoom , GS4 LTE , Galaxy note 2 and Galaxy note 3 . The rest of their phones shouldnt even exist . Even the Galaxy Tab pro 12.2 and 10.1 shouldnt exist , there is already a note tablet with the same specs but Spen .

posted on 11 Jan 2014, 04:22

28. __0__ (banned) (Posts: 242; Member since: 07 Jan 2014)

Samsung should have used Quad A15 and Dual A7 in this crappy phone that shouldnt exist

posted on 11 Jan 2014, 12:19

32. Extradite (banned) (Posts: 316; Member since: 30 Dec 2013)

Very well said.

But all the users on here prefer an iNtel i3 and not the iNtel i5, "how weird" so you wouldn't drive or take the V8 engine, and rather take the V6. You would drive a 2litre car when the 3litre car performs better. What joke is this.

These users are insulting and neglecting a A15 cores, but rather take the "Glorified" A9, like what Shatter said.

This is the year for A15s, not a 3years old A9Cortex.
I'd love the A57 at 22Nm, clocked at 3.0Ghz than a Snapdragons S805.

SD800 is clocked at 2.3, vs a A15 which is clocked at 1.6, which syill the A15 is on par with the S800. If those A15s were at 2.3, it will blow the S800 away.

Funny that guy -0- calls the A15 a crap CPU, looks like he is fanboy, and is really so jealous and angry that Snapdragon could not, and don't even have. A15CPUs yet. Even Apple have a A15CPU on there iP5s...

Joke of the century

posted on 11 Jan 2014, 13:59

33. docj8404 (Posts: 73; Member since: 23 Jan 2013)

What are you rambling on about...?

You've made it apparent 2014 is going to be another year where people neglect real life, everyday performance for numbers, numbers & more numbers. As it was mentioned above, you need not look further than the Galaxy Note 3 SD800 & Exynos variants to see that, despite whatever you'd like to classify the architecture of SD800 as, it's highly preferred over it's Exynos (A15) counterpart for performance & battery life. I'm sure the same goes for the Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 .

The only thing which made sense out of your clusterf*ck of a comment was that yes, 2014 should see a mass introduction of updated silicon, but even so, raw power without the balance of respectable battery life isn't exactly what I would refer to as progression. Didn't you notice your precious A15 Exynos Quad didn't come in a stand alone solution this past year? I don't need to point out the obvious... I'm sure you can piece it together.

Instead of being concerned with raw measures of specifications, you should be concerned with if those parts powering your device will provide you with an satisfying experience in the ways of overall performance, battery life & quality.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories