Samsung's defense against Apple calls up prior art... by Stanley Kubrick
1. ztedac posted on 24 Aug 2011, 20:14 2 1
some humor by samsung to apple's face =D
clearly the fruit did not invent the tablet concept as claimed
12. stealthd posted on 25 Aug 2011, 18:53 0 0
And where exactly did they claim to have invented the tablet?
2. Droid_X_Doug posted on 24 Aug 2011, 20:18 0 1
The tablets that are in use in the movie look closer to Sammy's form factor.... Maybe Sammy could sue (or is it sew?) for an injunction against sale of iPads?
9. remixfa posted on 25 Aug 2011, 16:20 0 0
yea, thats the "ultra widescreen" format.. lol. Apple prefers 4:3.
3. antipatent (unregistered) posted on 24 Aug 2011, 20:22 0 0
and stop making the 3 front button design with middle button pls
lets start using normal android 4 button or no button.
4. drooidfan_007 (unregistered) posted on 24 Aug 2011, 20:24 0 0
Has anybody seen the movie? As I recall the guys holding those devices in their hand before...
5. cheetah2k posted on 24 Aug 2011, 20:49 0 0
The "tablet" concept had been around long before Apple ever got hold of it.
The challenge for Apple (though) was to make it slim and very functional, which they did a pretty good job of.
The fact Apple is trying to lay claim to "inventing" the tablet (ie, patenting it), is in itself, a very large slice of Science Fiction IMO
6. hey tardface (unregistered) posted on 24 Aug 2011, 21:21 0 2
Ok, stay with me here, ill type it real slow for ya... ok
I make tv's.... That functions
I make worlds biggest tv.... that functions
U make bigger tv... that functions
I can no longer claim to call my tv... well, the worlds biggest tv.
so... do i sue you now.
no... I go back and think of something else new or make a bigger tv.
It's a stupid reason to sue... bottom line
7. ardent1 posted on 25 Aug 2011, 00:51 2 2
Samsung is so desperate. I am surprised Samsung attorneys didn't use clay tablets with cuniform as an example of prior art.
Everyone should know that the PC tablet existed almost ten years before the iPad. What Apple did was create a new class of tablets that Samsung blatantly tried to copy. Samsung crossed the line and chose to ignore Apple's private complaints.
Samsung, you reap what you sow.
8. jacko (unregistered) posted on 25 Aug 2011, 06:00 0 0
ok sammy copied the ipad so when did sammy-256.7 x 175.3 x 8.6 mm become ijunkpad-241.2 x 185.7 x 8.8 mm its like saying a truck is a car
oh and u can do more with an android tablet
Crapel--you reap what you sow
10. remixfa posted on 25 Aug 2011, 16:20 0 0
tell me all the exact points of copying between Samsungs widescreen honeycomb tablet and apples 4:3 10 inch ipod?
11. darth8ball posted on 25 Aug 2011, 16:41 0 2
So two devices that are not the same shape, don't look anything alike side by side, and run different OS's are the same because one company copied the other while designing it's completly different product.
Like saying Filet Mignon and a burger patty are the same because both are round and made of beef. Or a soccer ball and a basketball because both are round and filled with air and made of leather. Like Pam Anderson and Kathy Bates because both have skin, long hair boobs and a coocher. I could go on all night but going home to make my girl squeal
13. gallitoking posted on 25 Aug 2011, 19:19 0 0
Samsung....!!! listen up... please watch an episode of south park... Humancentipad..... while you are at it.....lol....
15. 530gemini posted on 25 Aug 2011, 22:23 0 0
My goodness. So Samsung never heard of the iphone and the ipad. They just stumbled on a 1960's film and then produced their galaxy tab, lol. Samsung's excuses are soooooo lame.