x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






Samsung to use a 32nm quad-core Exynos and its own LTE baseband radio in the Galaxy S III

0. phoneArena 19 Mar 2012, 08:35 posted on

The hamster wheel that will power the Samsung Galaxy S III has been shrouded in mystery so far, but thanks to a Samsung exec who shall not be named, now we know that it will be a quad-core 32nm Exynos processor...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 10:37

18. ph00ny (Posts: 1268; Member since: 26 May 2011)


I'm pretty sure when that performance figure was given, it was based on a dual core demo configuration

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 08:58 2

4. ngo2dd (Posts: 896; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)


So I have a feeling remixfa is going to comment on how PA is wrong because his "God" chipset is suppose to have 2X the performance I guess he is wrong.

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 12:53 1

29. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


or your an iDiot. just saying.

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 14:24 2

36. ngo2dd (Posts: 896; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)


Okay troll.
Here is your comment on PA a couple day ago making up number again.
"it wont. the quad core 4212 exynos is supposed to be about 2x as fast as the current exynos. Either way, it outclasses the S4 and T3 pretty handily. The S4 is already making its steady fall back to the bottom.. lol."
in an article that was not even about the S4 and noone
said anything about the S4 before you.
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Huawei-Ascend-D-Quad-XL-has-crazy-fast-benchmarks_id28179

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 16:40

48. SleepingOz (unregistered)


You were trolling first, so basically, you're the troll.

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 17:53 1

49. ngo2dd (Posts: 896; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)


I was making a statement that was true so I was not trolling.

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 09:01

5. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


Did I miss something - what is the GPU that will power the GSIII?

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 09:22

7. pooked (Posts: 56; Member since: 27 Jan 2012)


I like, and if i like everyone likes!!!

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 09:35 4

11. Doakie (Posts: 2109; Member since: 06 May 2009)


Who are you? Steve Jobs? So confident in your assessment.

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 10:12 1

16. RamyRamz69 (Posts: 390; Member since: 12 Dec 2011)


Steve Jobs?

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 09:33 2

10. InspectorGadget80 (unregistered)


CAN I SEE THE FREAKIN PHONE ALREADY??

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 09:42 4

12. Guest_star (Posts: 231; Member since: 30 Dec 2011)


Oh snap no cortex a-15 for y'all samy fans :D

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 10:29 3

17. GuiltyBystander (Posts: 199; Member since: 05 Mar 2012)


"26% performance improvement in the new Exynos"

Wot? only 26%.. the thing has 2 more cores than the SII and a 300Mhz bump and only 26% improvement? one would expect at least 50% improvement.. but i guess they balanced the power with battery life so the 50% gains in battery life explains why there isn't much of an improvement.. but i think if they added an extra core like Nvidia did that would be better..

But i'm a little bit disappointed that they wont use the Exynos 5250 which is based on the A-15 architecture,,

Anyway, I really hope this isn't true.

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 10:38

19. newbey123 (Posts: 606; Member since: 19 Mar 2012)


My upgrade has been up for a while and my phone is on its last legs I think. I was debating on waiting for this or getting the HTC Once X on AT&T. The X is going to be out the first few weeks of April and have the newer technology, but I can wait if needed.

Which would you guys go with?

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 10:43

20. johnny9000 (Posts: 50; Member since: 10 Sep 2011)


Same antenna as the Nexus? Well, as a Nexus owner to any future GS III I say, beware! I've never had poorer reception for calls or data as I do with my phone. I owned the Razr for about a week and it absolutely killed my Nexus reception, wish I would've kept it.

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 11:10 4

21. medicci37 (Posts: 1289; Member since: 19 Nov 2011)


The 1 thing i wish they would change on the GS III is the processor. Would rather have a dual core A15 than a quad core A9.

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 11:26 4

22. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4860; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)


I think I might have to second that.

+1 to you!

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 12:55

30. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


i could care less as long as it gives me the power and battery life i crave. there are certain things the quadcore will do better by the ability of its extra processors for multithreading, and there are things the dual core will do better by being on the better chip implementation.

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 13:20 1

32. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4860; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)


Yeah it's tough to choose but I would still take a 2.0 to 2.5GHz dual-core A15 Exynos over say a 1.5GHz quad-core A9 Exynos.

Maybe I would take it if the quad-core A9 Exynos was like 1.8GHz or above. Just my opinion though.

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 13:58

33. jove39 (Posts: 1889; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)


" 26% performance improvement in the new Exynos, with 50% gains in battery life" It doesn't indicate new exynos is grown from 2cores to 4 cores...just indicate higher clock speed.

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 14:01

34. jinwons (Posts: 95; Member since: 24 Nov 2010)


I think they got numbers mixed up. When dual Exynos 4212 was announced late last year, they said 50% improvement in GPU performance and 25% improvement in battery for the same clock. I think that's what he meant for 4412 vs 4210 as well. With higher clock speed kicked in, I'm sure 4412 will have impressive performance over 4210.

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 15:15 1

40. mkzme (Posts: 1; Member since: 19 Mar 2012)


remixfa, seriously mate, you really need to chill out, your numbers don't make sense anymore. you need to chill out take a deep breath. except for being fast yr beloved samsung galaxy has an ordinary design and its a very cheap build. No matter what you say companies like HTC or Moto managed to make good products and sold loads without having to copycat the iphone. I agree with evo, when S4 Pro comes out it will kick ass. As if this is true and the galaxy S3 comes with only a 26% improvement in performance from S2, then we might as well wait for the new galaxy S4. If HTC would have managed to have put a bigger battery in their One X i would have been the first one to buy it, as for me im waiting for the next HTC flagship or maybe the new galaxy note. Definitely not S3...

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 16:05

44. lukasound (Posts: 152; Member since: 16 Nov 2011)


Well, i guess that is good enough to beat the competition, but not that revolutionary...

You have to consider the use of such a processor - Android UI is taken care of already and now benefits more from the GPU, and as far as i'm concerned - aps and games load fast and smooth on the current dual core Exynos. IO is maybe even more important for this...

What i wanted to say is that the GPU upgrade is more important for now... Especially considering the higher res screen. And we can have the A15 in SGS4 :)

posted on 19 Mar 2012, 16:17

46. ngo2dd (Posts: 896; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)


There is no real reason to have all this power. Mobile gaming is a joke on a phone, yes it look nices but you will not have a deep and rich game play without a control or mouse/keyboard. Can you see playing league of legend or Forza without a control. My playstation vita is more then even thank you.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories